3% deferral rate for 401(k)s not nearly enough: Mary Beth Franklin

Says employers need to at least triple standard salary set-aside for workers

Jun 19, 2012 @ 1:51 pm

By Darla Mercado

The fate of boomers' retirement may be mostly sealed, but it's not too late for employers to help rescue their younger workers — many of whom have misguided notions about how much money they should sock away.

“Employers and providers are in a role of making a bad situation a little better,” InvestmentNews contributing editor Mary Beth Franklin said Tuesday at the Society of Professional Asset Managers and Record Keepers' national conference in Washington. “Workers are turning to their employers to figure out how to save more for retirement."

While plan sponsors are nudging their participants toward retirement safety through the use of auto-enrollment in a 401(k) plan, such basic steps alone are insufficient when it comes to preparing for success in retirement.

According to one plan provider, that's something employees don't grasp. “Participants don't understand how much of the plan sponsor's actions are guided by the regulatory framework," Chip Castille, head of BlackRock Inc.'s U.S. and Canada defined-benefit group said during an earlier presentation. "They think all sponsor activity is driven by paternalistic interests in participant outcomes.”

Instead of measuring retirement readiness through the number of people enrolled in a plan, plan sponsors should weigh their success by determining how many workers are on track to replace their income in retirement, Ms. Franklin said.

Those ideas include raising the initial salary deferral amount from the 3% standard. “Employees see this [number] as an imprimatur, but the deferral really needs to be closer to 10%, 12% or 15%,” Ms. Franklin added.

She also suggested that plan sponsors remove arbitrary caps on auto-escalation features, which automatically raise contribution amounts toward retirement plans.

“For those employers who are matching with an auto- escalation clause, let it go up to the IRS limit,” she said. “Don't put artificial limits on auto-escalation.”

Ms. Franlin also suggested that employers alter their contribution matching formula to give employees an incentive to make higher contributions. “Rather than putting in 100% [matching] at 2% of pay, if you match 25% at 8% of pay, it will cost the employer the same but requires the employee to put in more in order to get the match,” she said.

Turning the savings conversation toward income also is a way to push workers to hike their savings rates. “Employees would be better served if they could understand how much income their current savings can buy,” Ms. Franklin said. “Translating 401(k) balances into future retirement income is one of the most effective ways to get people to increase salary deferrals.”

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Events

What investment tools should you add in 2018?

As you look ahead to 2018, what types of financial products would you like to add to your quiver? Financial advisers at the MarketCounsel Summit offered their perspective, but one thing is clear "choice is power."

Video Spotlight

Help Clients Be Prepared, Not Surprised

Sponsored by Prudential

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

RIAs struggle to keep clients grounded amid stock market euphoria

With equities at record levels, financial advisers are confronted with realities of greed and fear.

Regulators showing renewed interest in cracking down on investment fees

SEC, Finra targeting high-fee share classes, 12b-1 fees and failure to give sales load discounts and waivers to investors.

Tax update: Brady says sales tax deduction in final bill

Taxpayers will be able to deduct state income taxes or state sales taxes in addition to property levies — up to a $10,000 cap.

Complexity of new indexed annuities causing concern

Insurers are using 'hybrid' indices as a way to differentiate themselves, but critics contend the products are less transparent, more confusing and don't add financial benefit.

Critics say regulation hasn't curbed overly rosy projections for indexed universal life insurance

They say rule didn't go far enough and more stringent measures may be necessary.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print