Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Register  |  Subscribe  |  Rss Icon RSS  |  Current Issue
    • Related topics:
  • tax
 
Tax Insight

Placing a value on insurance stock

By Vinu “Vinny” Satchit
November 4, 2008
Post a Comment
Situation:Suppose one of your clients received a large amount of stock in the New York-based Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. when MetLife converted from mutual to public ownership in 2000.

Over the last two years, your client has sold some of the stock and now is contemplating selling more.

What is the cost basis of the stock used to compute the capital gains for the last two years?

Solution

A mutual insurance company is one that is owned by participating policyholders (“members”) who possess ownership rights, such as voting and distribution rights, including the right to share in the insurance company’s residual value if it is being wound up.

Since the 1930s, more than 200 mutual insurance companies have converted into publicly traded stock companies.

As a part of this demutualization, existing members are typically awarded shares in the newly formed publicly traded entity to compensate them for the loss of voting control and the right to share in the insurance company’s residual value if it is wound up.

So how does one determine the basis of the shares received via demutualization?

The IRS position is that the basis of a policyholder’s membership is zero, and thus, the basis of stock received in exchange for a membership interest is also zero.

In a recent case (Fisher, 102 AFTR 2d 2008-5608), the Court of Federal Claims disagreed.

It stated that no gain should be realized upon the sale of stock received as a part of demutualization until the entire basis of the life insurance policy is recovered.

The IRS has not decided on whether to appeal the case.

For now, your client should discuss with his or her accountant the possibility of filing amended returns for prior open tax years since the client did not apply any basis against the proceeds.

Your client should be cautioned that the Fisher case may be overturned if appealed, and that other courts, including the Tax Court, may disagree with the Court of Federal Claims.

Tax INsight is prepared by experts who are active members of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Tax INsight appears on the web and in IN Daily every Tuesday. Comments are welcome at IN_Editor@InvestmentNews.com.

Michael M. Eisenberg

Michelle Musacchio

Vinu Satchit

Keneth Straus

Read our weekly online columns:

MONDAY: IN Practice by Maureen Wilke

TUESDAY: Tax INsight

WEDNESDAY: OpINion Online by Evan Cooper

THURSDAY: IN Retirement

FRIDAY: Tech Bits by Davis. D. Janowski

disclaimer:

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed are those of the individuals and do not represent the opinion of the AICPA, its committees, or InvestmentNews. Tax INsight is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information on the subjects covered. It is provided, however, with the understanding that Crain Communications Inc. and the experts are not engaged in rendering accounting, legal, tax or other professional services. To ensure compliance with IRS requirements, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.





Recommend this article?

User Comments






Reproductions and distribution of the above news story are strictly prohibited. To order reprints and/or request permission to use the article in full or partial format please contact our Reprint Sales Manager at (732) 723-0569.
Consuelo Mack Wealthtrack

 



Fund Data Provided by
Markets Data Provided by
Lipper QuoteMedia