'Merrill Lynch rule' struck down

Mar 30, 2007 @ 11:23 am

By Sara Hansard

The Securities and Exchange Commission’s so-called “Merrill Lynch rule” was overturned in a 2-1 decision released Friday morning by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Washington.… indicators of congressional intent support the SEC’s interpretation of its authority,” Judge Rogers wrote.

The decision is a big win for the Financial Planning Association of Denver, which challenged the SEC when it issued its rule in 2005 exempting brokerage firms that charge asset-based fees from investment advisory regulations under specified conditions.

The ruling, written by Judge Judith Rogers for herself and Judge Brett Kavanaugh, said the SEC exceeded its authority by exempting brokerage firms that charge asset-based fees from regulation under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

“The rule is inconsistent with the IAA,” Judge Rogers wrote, because it fails to meet the law’s requirements for exemptions.

Under that law, she wrote, brokers can only be exempt from advisory regulation if they do not receive “special compensation” for giving advice.

Charging asset-based fees means they must register as advisers.

“No… indicators of congressional intent support the SEC’s interpretation of its authority,” Judge Rogers wrote.

Judge Merrick Garland, who dissented, said that the SEC’s interpretation of the IAA was reasonable, and courts are bound by legal precedent to give government regulators the benefit of the doubt in interpreting the law.

The ruling is “very straightforward,” and a “clean decision,” commented David Tittsworth, executive director of the Investment Advisers Association in Washington.

“This is throwing the rule out.”

The decision opens the door for Congress to re-examine the securities laws in light of changes that have taken place in the industry since those laws were enacted in the Depression era.

“It looks to me like Congress probably will need to get into this fray to sort it out,” Mr. Tittsworth said.

“This rule should have died a quick and merciful death six years ago,” said FPA President Nicholas A. Nicolette.

“It would not be the best use of taxpayer dollars to prolong a policy that is contrary to the public interest.”


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


Regulatory trends for 2018

What regulatory issues should be on advisers' radar? Colleen Bell of Cambridge Investment Research and Lori Vinciguerra of Pershing offer their predictions and insights.

Latest news & opinion

House passes tax bill, focus turns to Senate

Tax reform legislation expected to have more of a challenge in upper chamber.

SEC enforcement of advisers drops in Trump era

The agency pursued 82 cases against advisers and firms in fiscal year 2017, down from 98 the previous year.

PIABA accuses Finra of conflicts of interest

Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association report slams self-regulator over its picks for board of governors.

Betterment launches 'free' charitable-giving platform

Robo-software provider lets investors donate directly from their accounts, and will not charge charities with less than $1 million on the platform.

Cole Capital, once part of a company coveted by Nicholas Schorsch, is being sold

Vereit, formerly American Realty Capital Properties Inc., is selling Cole Capital as it exits the nontraded REIT business.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print