Dems float ‘no bailout’ bailout package

Sep 30, 2008 @ 5:42 pm

By Janet Morrissey and Sara Hansard

The “No Bailouts Act” was introduced today by a group of House Democrats led by Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., in the wake of yesterday’s failed bailout package.

The proposal includes boosting FDIC insurance limits on bank deposits, changing the Securities and Exchange Commission rules on mark-to-market fair value accounting, launching a net worth certificate program, resurrecting the old security transfer tax and introducing a mechanism to stem to the flood of foreclosures, among other items.

Mr. Defazio, who voted against Monday’s bill, said Congress rightly refused to be strong-armed into pushing through bad legislation that is risky to taxpayers.

“The protections in that bill yesterday were nonexistent, in terms of the taxpayers,” he said.

Among the group’s proposals is a security transfer tax, similar to the one used from 1914 to 1966, which helped fund reconstruction projects during the Great Depression.

He estimates this tax, at 0.25%, would raise $150 billion a year.

This way, investors will pay for the bailout “in tiny, tiny increments,” Mr. Defazio said. Also, the group believes changing the SEC’s fair value accounting program would go a long way to easing the credit crunch that banks are facing.

“We don’t have a liquidity crisis — we have a credit crisis right now,” that has to do with the way assets are being valued, said Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio.

Fair value, under Statement 157 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board of Norwalk, Conn., requires companies to put current market values on securities in their portfolios even if those securities won't be sold for years.

This “mark-to-market” accounting has come under heavy criticism on Wall Street, as it forced many major banks to take hefty write-downs on securities and derivatives, even though the firms have no plans to sell those securities amid the market's turmoil.

Some critics have further argued that it is difficult to assess the value of many of those securities because of the slowdown in trading of those assets.

“The assets have value, and we need to change that accounting in order to ease the burden,” she said.

In addition, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. insurance limits on bank accounts would be raised to $250,000 from $100,000, which the backers of the plan say would help eliminate runs on banks.

The two-million-member Service Employees International Union of Washington immediately backed the plan.

“We finally have a plan that will restore confidence in the financial markets without writing a blank check to the same Wall Street banks and CEOs who got us into this mess,” SEIU president Andy Stern said in a statement.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

INTV

Special Needs Special Planning

Financial adviser John Nadworny’s path to help his son James led to his business focus on special needs planning.

Video Spotlight

Are Your Clients Prepared For Market Downturns?

Sponsored by Prudential

Video Spotlight

Path to growth

Video Spotlight

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Top 10 financial firms ranked by investor satisfaction

Find out which firm took the top slot for overall investor satisfaction for the second year in a row.

What not to say to clients when the markets drop

Here's what advisers should steer clear of saying the next time stocks turn downward.

SEC bars former rep for alleged share price manipulation

George Thoreson tried to keep penny stock's price high to enable Nasdaq listing.

A special need for financial advice

Advisers don't have to be experts to help special needs families get a jump on lifelong planning.

Broker-dealers and RIAs at loggerheads over fiduciary rule delay

Companies and groups weighing in with comment letters have vastly different viewpoints on the delay's potential impact.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print