Schwab wins $957K award from RBC

Panel rules that broker violated terms of employment agreement

Oct 12, 2008 @ 12:01 am

By Dan Jamieson

Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. has won a nearly $1 million award in an unusual raiding case against RBC Wealth Management Inc.

The case erupted after Philadelphia broker Scott Karpiak, who was part of San Francisco-based Schwab's advice unit, left to join the Minneapolis firm, previously known as RBC Dain Rauscher.

He ended up transferring about $24 million in assets to RBC, said Michael Greco, a partner at Fisher & Phillips LLP of Philadelphia, who represented Schwab.

An arbitration panel of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. of New York and Washington late last month awarded $957,000 to Schwab.

The panel upheld Schwab's employment agreement, which specified that Mr. Karpiak would owe Schwab 4% of any client assets he took from the company.

That type of clause is known as a "liquidated damages" provision and is unique to Schwab, Mr. Greco said.

The case could raise the stakes for Schwab brokers who change firms and solicit clients.

"It's the first case of its type that I'm aware of," Mr. Greco said.

He is handling similar cases for Schwab, which he declined to discuss.

A spokeswoman for RBC and Mr. Karpiak's attorney, Elliot Good of Chorpenning Good & Pandora Co. LPA of Columbus, Ohio, didn't return calls seeking comment. Other legal observers agreed that the Karpiak case appeared to be unique.

Typically, similar cases against wirehouse brokers are settled for a fraction of a broker's annual production. Brokers typically produce about 1% or less of assets under their control.

By contrast, the 4%-of-assets figure "seems heavy in that it represents multiple years of revenues from that size book of business," said Christopher Vernon, a founding partner of Vernon Healy LLC in Naples, Fla., who defends brokers. "In this case, 4% may have seemed equitable to the arbitrators if this was a book of business that Schwab ... just handed to the broker," he said.

"It is a different situation [than at a wirehouse], where you develop your own book by pounding the pavement," Mr. Greco said. At Schwab, brokers such as Mr. Karpiak work in teams and are given ac-counts to service, he said.

Still, the award could be a recognition by the arbitrators that "there's been [an industry] transition from a transaction-based business model to an asset-based business model," Mr. Greco added.

Legal observers doubt that other firms will follow Schwab and put liquidated-damages provisions in their broker contracts. "The problem is that a liquidated-damages clause in a contract may prevent firms from obtaining temporary restraining orders against their former employees," said Brent Burns, a lawyer at Lax & Neville LLP in New York.

Courts usually will grant restraining orders only if the plaintiff brokerage firm can argue that it will be irreparably harmed if a broker isn't prevented from taking clients.

"You can't go into court claiming that you have irreparable harm when the contract contains a liquidated-damages clause," Mr. Burns said.

But in the Karpiak case, Schwab was able to obtain a court injunction late last year that prevented him from soliciting Schwab customers.

The arbitration panel in Mr. Karpiak's case didn't explain its reasoning.

"So it is impossible to tell why the panel felt giving Schwab liquidated damages was proper in this case or why awarding such damages together with injunctive relief was proper," said Larry Moy, an employment lawyer and partner at Outten & Golden LLP in New York.

Mr. Greco said that a carefully drafted liquidated-damages provision and injunctive relief can go hand in hand.

"Sometimes the injunction can stop further harm, but it can't undo what's been done," he said. Liquidated damages can compensate for prior improper conduct.

In court testimony given in response to Schwab's request for an injunction against him, Mr. Karpiak admitted preparing a spreadsheet of customer names, addresses and account titles from information that he got in part from the firm's databases. He gave the information to RBC prior to departing Schwab.

Mr. Karpiak ultimately contacted about 90 clients, 17 of whom transferred their accounts to RBC.

He claimed that he was one of 200 individuals who were selected by Schwab to assist in developing a fee-based advisory program in 2001.

"Brokers changing jobs always get into trouble taking paper or data owned by their former employer," said Rodney Heggy, a lawyer with Heggy & Associates LLC in Oklahoma City, Okla. He said that reps need to be able to create an online phone book of clients from memory after they leave a firm.

E-mail Dan Jamieson at djamieson@investmentnews.com.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Oct 17

Conference

Best Practices Workshop

For the fifth year, InvestmentNews will host the Best Practices Workshop & Awards, bringing together the industry’s top-performing and most influential firms in one room for a full-day. This exclusive workshop and awards program for the... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

How advisers can better communicate the risks and rewards of investing in emerging markets

Senior columnist John Waggoner discusses how financial advisers can help clients better understand the advantages of having exposure to emerging markets and the increased volatility that often comes along with investing in them.

Latest news & opinion

Big gains attract new money to emerging markets, but should investors stay?

An estimated $6.7 billion has flowed into emerging-market stock funds and ETFs so far this year, according to Morningstar.

Attorney blasts Finra after regulator loses insider trading case

Lawyer says it was 'slimy' of Finra to publicize the case while it was still being litigated.

Will Jeffrey Gundlach's Trump-like approach on Twitter work in financial services?

The DoubleLine CEO's attacks on Wall Street Journal reporters is igniting a discussion on what's fair game on social media.

Fidelity wins arb case against wine mogul but earns a rebuke from Finra

In the case of investor Peter Deutsch, Fidelity doesn't have to pay any compensation, but regulator said firm put its interests ahead of his.

Plaintiffs win in Tibble vs. Edison 401(k) fee case

After a decade of activity around the lawsuit, including a hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court, judge rules a prudent fiduciary would have invested in institutional shares.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print