SEC staff to recommend change for 12(b)-1 fees

Rule governing mutual fund compensation is not well understood by investors, Schapiro says

Jun 2, 2009 @ 3:47 pm

By Sara Hansard

Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Mary Schapiro has asked SEC staff to prepare a recommendation to change Rule 12(b)-1, she said today at a Senate appropriations subcommittee hearing on the commission’s fiscal 2010 budget request.

Rule 12(b)-1 permits mutual funds to use fund assets to compensate broker-dealers and other intermediaries for distributing funds. Many critics have called for abolishing or changing the rule, while many broker-dealers depend on the $13 billion brought in by the fees to support the ability to monitor their customers’ investments.

“These fees, with their bureaucratic-sounding name and sometimes unclear purpose, are not well understood by investors,” Ms. Schapiro told the Senate Appropriations Committee’s Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government.

It is essential that the SEC “engage in a comprehensive re-examination of Rule 12(b)-1 and the fees collected pursuant to the rule,” she said. “If issues relating to these fees undermine investor interests, then we at the SEC have an obligation to step in and adjust our regulations.”

In other matters, the administration is requesting about $1 billion for the SEC in the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1, a 7% increase over the fiscal 2009 funding level.

Ms. Schapiro said that the additional resources “are essential if we hope to restore the SEC as a vigorous and effective regulator of our financial markets.”

The budget would cover funding for an additional 50 staff positions over 2008 levels, enhance the agency’s ability to uncover and prosecute fraud, and “begin to build desperately needed technology,” she said.

Ms. Schapiro said that in her tenure as SEC chairman, which began in January, the issue of short selling has “outpaced any other in terms of the number of inquiries, suggestions and expressions of concerns we have received.”

In April, the SEC proposed two approaches to restricting short selling: a permanent, market-wide short-sale price test, and temporary short-selling restrictions on individual securities during periods of severe market price declines.

In May, the SEC held a round table to get the views of investors, issuers, financial service firms, self-regulatory organizations and others on the proposals.

The SEC recognizes “that strong rules and vigorous enforcement are needed to curb abusive short selling and restore confidence in our markets,” Ms. Schapiro said.

The SEC’s focus on abusive naked short selling has led to a significant decline in failures to deliver securities on time following a short sale, and the Division of Enforcement has a number of active investigations involving potentially abusive short selling, she said.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

INTV

When can advisers expect an SEC fiduciary rule proposal and other regs this year?

Managing editor Christina Nelson and senior reporter Mark Schoeff Jr. discuss regulations of consequence to financial advisers in 2018, and their likely timing.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

El-Erian warns advisers on ETF liquidity

If investors decide to exit exchange-traded funds en masse, things could get nasty, economist says.

Pass-through provision in new tax law could benefit REITs, MLPs

Investors in such instruments are eligible for a 20% tax deduction as a result of the pass-through provision.

Fidelity charging new fee on Vanguard assets held in 401(k) plans

The 0.05% fee is ostensibly a response to Vanguard's distribution model, but may also make the company's funds less attractive due to higher cost.

UBS adviser count continues to decline

Firm to merge U.S., global wealth management units on Feb. 1

TD Ameritrade launches all-night trading for ETFs

Twelve funds now can be traded after-hours, but the list will grow, company says.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print