SEC staff to recommend change for 12(b)-1 fees

Rule governing mutual fund compensation is not well understood by investors, Schapiro says

Jun 2, 2009 @ 3:47 pm

By Sara Hansard

Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Mary Schapiro has asked SEC staff to prepare a recommendation to change Rule 12(b)-1, she said today at a Senate appropriations subcommittee hearing on the commission’s fiscal 2010 budget request.

Rule 12(b)-1 permits mutual funds to use fund assets to compensate broker-dealers and other intermediaries for distributing funds. Many critics have called for abolishing or changing the rule, while many broker-dealers depend on the $13 billion brought in by the fees to support the ability to monitor their customers’ investments.

“These fees, with their bureaucratic-sounding name and sometimes unclear purpose, are not well understood by investors,” Ms. Schapiro told the Senate Appropriations Committee’s Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government.

It is essential that the SEC “engage in a comprehensive re-examination of Rule 12(b)-1 and the fees collected pursuant to the rule,” she said. “If issues relating to these fees undermine investor interests, then we at the SEC have an obligation to step in and adjust our regulations.”

In other matters, the administration is requesting about $1 billion for the SEC in the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1, a 7% increase over the fiscal 2009 funding level.

Ms. Schapiro said that the additional resources “are essential if we hope to restore the SEC as a vigorous and effective regulator of our financial markets.”

The budget would cover funding for an additional 50 staff positions over 2008 levels, enhance the agency’s ability to uncover and prosecute fraud, and “begin to build desperately needed technology,” she said.

Ms. Schapiro said that in her tenure as SEC chairman, which began in January, the issue of short selling has “outpaced any other in terms of the number of inquiries, suggestions and expressions of concerns we have received.”

In April, the SEC proposed two approaches to restricting short selling: a permanent, market-wide short-sale price test, and temporary short-selling restrictions on individual securities during periods of severe market price declines.

In May, the SEC held a round table to get the views of investors, issuers, financial service firms, self-regulatory organizations and others on the proposals.

The SEC recognizes “that strong rules and vigorous enforcement are needed to curb abusive short selling and restore confidence in our markets,” Ms. Schapiro said.

The SEC’s focus on abusive naked short selling has led to a significant decline in failures to deliver securities on time following a short sale, and the Division of Enforcement has a number of active investigations involving potentially abusive short selling, she said.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

INTV

Ed Slott: Many investors are still not using this IRA strategy to save on taxes

If you have a client who has an IRA that is subject to required minimum distributions and they're donating to charity, they should be using qualified charitable distributions, according to Ed Slott, founder of Ed Slott's Elite IRA Advisor Group.

Video Spotlight

Will It Last As Long As Your Clients Do?

Sponsored by Prudential

Video Spotlight

The Catalyst

Sponsored by Pershing

Latest news & opinion

Brian Block's $4 million bonus was tied to a key metric at ARCP

Prosecution rests case in fraud trial against CFO of American Realty Capital Properties.

Edward Jones is winning the Google search war

Brokerage firm's digital marketing investment helps land it at the top of local and overall search engine results, report finds.

Voya's win in 401(k) fee suit involving Financial Engines bodes well for other record keepers

Fidelity, Aon Hewitt and Xerox HR Solutions are currently defending against similar fiduciary-breach claims.

Collective investment trusts getting more attention from 401(k) advisers

The funds are catching on due largely to lower costs and more product availability, but come with some inherent drawbacks.

Vanguard rides robo-advice wave to $65B in assets

Personal Advisor Services, four times the size of its closest competitor, combines digital and human touch.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print