American Funds sets vote on anti-genocide resolution

Investors to decide whether to implement a divestment policy

Sep 6, 2009 @ 12:01 am

By Sue Asci

For the first time, American Funds shareholders this fall will be voting on whether to ask the boards of directors of 16 funds to institute a divestment policy against companies that do business in countries that practice genocide or tolerate crimes against humanity.

The 16 funds represent $700 billion in assets.

Several of those funds have holdings in such companies as Petro-China, which does business in Sudan, where the government has conducted genocide in the Darfur region.

The shareholder resolution, submitted as part of the efforts of Investors Against Genocide, is non-binding.

It asks the boards to “to institute procedures to prevent holding investments in companies that, in the judgment of the board, substantially contribute to genocide or crimes against humanity, the most egregious violations of human rights.”

The boards of directors of the funds expressed opposition to the resolution.

“We believe that considering these issues on a company-by-company basis and as part of the investment management process is preferable to having the fund boards make these decisions,” said American Funds spokesman Chuck Freadhoff.

Eric Cohen, chairman of In-vestors Against Genocide, said the activist group contacted senior executives at American Funds and asked them to embrace the resolution or at least remain neutral.

“We were disappointed that when the definitive [document] was filed, they were opposed to it,” he said.

“There will be a lot of automatic voting that will go the American Funds' way. Like the other votes, we expect that 20% will vote our way,” Mr. Cohen said.

However, “that 20% will represent a very large number of shareholders that will be angry with them,” he said.

As of June 30, American Funds, advised by Capital Research and Management Co., had $850 billion in assets under management.

The Investment Company of America fund will hold its shareholder meeting Oct. 27.

The votes for all of the other funds involved will be Nov. 24.

Earlier this year, Investors Against Genocide worked with shareholders to introduce similar resolutions on mutual fund proxies at Fidelity Investments and The Vanguard Group Inc.

E-mail Sue Asci at


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


Building digital relationships with a human touch

The word "robo" has stopped being a four-letter word for financial advisers. But how can it be an asset? Quovo's Jeff Hendren explains.

Video Spotlight

Will It Last As Long As Your Clients Do?

Sponsored by Prudential

Video Spotlight

The Catalyst

Sponsored by Pershing

Latest news & opinion

Brian Block's $4 million bonus was tied to a key metric at ARCP

Prosecution rests case in fraud trial against CFO of American Realty Capital Properties.

Edward Jones is winning the Google search war

Brokerage firm's digital marketing investment helps land it at the top of local and overall search engine results, report finds.

Voya's win in 401(k) fee suit involving Financial Engines bodes well for other record keepers

Fidelity, Aon Hewitt and Xerox HR Solutions are currently defending against similar fiduciary-breach claims.

Collective investment trusts getting more attention from 401(k) advisers

The funds are catching on due largely to lower costs and more product availability, but come with some inherent drawbacks.

Vanguard rides robo-advice wave to $65B in assets

Personal Advisor Services, four times the size of its closest competitor, combines digital and human touch.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print