Adviser groups blow tops over House bill's ‘hat-switching' clause

Critics claim the provision renders fiduciary duty requirement useless

Dec 15, 2009 @ 1:01 pm

By Sara Hansard

Investment adviser groups are up in arms about a one-sentence provision buried in the sweeping financial services reform legislation approved last week by the House of Representatives that would allow brokers to provide advice under a fiduciary standard and then execute that advice under a lower suitability standard.

The legislation, if enacted, would require the Securities and Exchange Commission to write rules that would establish a fiduciary duty for brokers who provide investment advice. However, the bill adds a qualifier to that requirement: “Nothing in this section shall require a broker or dealer or registered representative to have a continuing duty of care or loyalty to the customer after providing personalized investment advice about securities.”

The provision was added to cover discount brokerage firms, such as Charles Schwab & Co. Inc., according to lobbyists working on the legislation.

The so-called hat-switching provision essentially renders the fiduciary duty requirement useless, say critics.

“That could be read to eviscerate fiduciary duty,” Marilyn Mohrman-Gillis, managing director of public policy for the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards Inc., said of the provision.

The CFP Board is part of the Financial Planning Coalition, which has called for adopting traditional fiduciary standards for brokers who provide advice.

“It's OK to hat-switch” under the provision, said Neil Simon, vice president of government relations for the Investment Adviser Association. Under the clause, “The duty applies only at the time the advice is given. It does not extend throughout the relationship.”

Allowing brokers to “switch hats” between the two standards of care would confuse clients, he adds.

Fiduciary standards that investment advisory firms have come under require that advisers act in the best interest of their customers. Suitability standards that brokers are required to abide by require that investment recommendations be suitable for clients.

Fiduciary standards generally require more disclosure from advisers concerning possible conflicts of interest. Advisers who are held to fiduciary standards also face greater liability for the investment recommendations they make.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video


Diversity & Inclusion Awards: 2018 nominations are open

Editor Fred Gabriel and special projects editor Liz Skinner discuss the nomination process for InvestmentNews' inaugural Diversity & Inclusion awards.

Latest news & opinion

Broker protocol: Indecision over recruiting agreement is rampant

Ruckus over recruiting agreement has even wirehouse lifers wondering if it's time

Cetera reportedly exploring $1.5 billion sale

The company confirmed it's talking to investment bankers to 'explore how to best optimize [its] capital structure at lower costs.'

Advisers bemoan LPL's technology platform change

Those in a private LinkedIn chat room were sounding off about fears the independent broker-dealer will require a move to ClientWorks before it is fully ready.

Speculation mounts on whether others will follow UBS' latest move to prevent brokers from leaving

UBS brokers must sign a 12-month non-solicit agreement if they want their 2017 bonuses.

Maryland jumps into fiduciary fray with legislation requiring brokers to act in best interests of clients

Legislation requires brokers to act in the best interests of clients.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print