Distribution moratorium doomed

Lack of 'political oomph' in time of deficit

Feb 7, 2010 @ 12:01 am

By Jessica Toonkel Marquez

Bills introduced recently to give seniors another year's grace on required minimum distributions from retirement accounts won't get any traction in Congress, according to experts.

The most recent bill, HR 4421, which was introduced last month by Rep. Joe Sestak, D-Pa., would extend the one-year moratorium on distributions established under the Worker, Retiree and Employer Recovery Act of 2008 through this year. Mr. Sestak's bill joins similar proposals S 157 and HR 424.

Under the minimum-required-distribution rules that went back into effect this year, workers must start receiving life-expectancy-based minimum payments from their retirement plans when they reach 701/2.

The initial moratorium was enacted in the wake of the 2008 market crash and during the presidential campaign, noted James M. Delaplane Jr., a partner at Davis & Harman LLP. “A lot of seniors were talking about it,” he said.

But the climate has changed, and there isn't as much interest in passing these bills, Mr. Delaplane said, noting that lawmakers aren't hearing from senior citizens on this issue like they did during the market meltdown.

“There doesn't seem to be any appetite in Congress for this,” Mr. Delaplane said. “There is no political oomph, and given the deficits, this isn't appealing legislation.”

Advisers should be managing older clients' assets on the assumption that the required-minimum distributions will apply this year, said David L. Wolfe, a partner at Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.

“The market has rebounded, but it hasn't completely come back, and to the extent that we could still see some market reversals in 2010, this could be an issue for clients,” he said.

E-mail Jessica Toonkel Marquez at jmarquez@investmentnews.com.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video

Events

3 tips when hiring millennials

Advisers want to add young talent, but ask if they want to add millennials and most will begin to squirm. Hunter Hart, and Marc Schliefer of Equity Planning Inc. disspell some myths and misconceptions of hiring millennials.

Video Spotlight

The Search for Income

Sponsored by PGIM Investments

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Shift to Roth 401(k)s 'highly likely' part of tax reform: former Treasury official Mark Iwry

Mandated contributions to Roth accounts would likely only be partial, as opposed to having a full repeal of pre-tax accounts.

E*Trade acquiring custodian Trust Company of America

Discount broker buying second-tier custodian for $275 million.

LPL retains $570 million with super-OSJ deal

Kansas-based nVision Wealth will come under supervision of Chicago-based IHT Wealth Management.

How does your advisory firm stack up?

Comparing a firm's pay to the competition can point out vast flaws.

10 signs your client is cheating on you

Sure signs that clients may be on the way out the door.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print