Subscribe

Insurance regulators to examine controversial death benefit scheme

The hearing will concentrate on the practice of baiting seniors and terminally ill people to act as insured lives on an annuity purchase, with the death benefit going toward a third-party investor or an intermediary.

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners will hold a May 20 hearing in Washington to address stranger-originated-annuity transactions. In such transactions, investors pay seniors or the sickly a lump sum in exchange for the death benefits tied to annuities.
The hearing will concentrate on the practice of baiting seniors and terminally ill people to act as insured lives on an annuity purchase, with the death benefit going toward a third-party investor or an intermediary.
Regulators have zeroed in on the issue after The Wall Street Journal reported on a Rhode Island attorney who played matchmaker to elderly or sickly annuitants and wealthy investors. The investors paid the elderly and sick a $2,000 fee to use their names on the annuity. Once an annuitant passed away, investors reaped a windfall in the form of an enhanced death benefit.
Insurers, including Transamerica Life Insurance Co. and Western Reserve Life Assurance Company of Ohio, have been fighting back against such practices, asserting in federal court that state insurable-interest laws apply to annuity death benefits. The insurers have sued the attorney in the Journal story, as well as the broker-dealers and registered representatives who processed the annuities.
Insurable interest in a stranger-originated-annuity transaction is precisely what the Life Insurance and Annuities Committee would like to cover in its May hearing.
The group also hopes to weigh in on whether the transactions are lawful and whether the models and regulations should be tweaked for consumer protection.

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Stuck in the middle

Newly elected Finra board member whose firm is connected to a bribery scandal says the matter should have no effect on his ability to serve.

Fighting for market share in the LTC business

A handful of publicly held life insurers dominate the market for traditional long-term-care insurance, but mutual life insurers are beginning to make inroads with agents and financial advisers.

Breaking up is hard to do – especially with annuities

When a client came to his office bearing her new divorce decree, adviser Dale Russell became the bearer…

Longevity insurance promising – but higher rates would help

The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service like it, as do many estate-planning experts. Now all…

Long-term care: Cutting back coverage

When a 74-year-old client visited Ellen R. Siegel six years ago with news of an upcoming 12% rate increase on the premium of her long-term-care insurance, the adviser knew she had to navigate the potential benefit cuts with the precision of a surgeon.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print