Editorial

Chart investment strategy now for 2011 tax changes

May 9, 2010 @ 12:01 am

The months and weeks leading up to the end of the year could see more than the usual turmoil in the stock market as investors, guided by their financial planners and investment advisers, adjust their portfolios ahead of

the new tax environment that they will face in 2011.

Investors and their advisers should be planning their moves now — not waiting until the last moment.

One big movement could be out of dividend-paying stocks because the double taxation of dividends, greatly reduced by the Bush administration's tax cuts of 2003, will return in force next year.

The 2003 tax cuts, which were designed to offset the impact of the bursting of the technology bubble and the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, reduced the tax rate on most ordinary dividends to 15% from the rate that taxpayers paid on ordinary income.

That equalized the tax treatment of dividends and long-term capital gains, which also were taxed at a 15% rate, making investors favor neither dividends nor capital gains. Previously, the tax disparity encouraged investors to favor capital gains.

With the expiration of the 2003 tax cuts, dividends again will be taxed at a taxpayer's ordinary tax rate. For the wealthy, this could be as high as 39.6% and could rise as high as 43.5% when the tax imposed on couples who earn more than $250,000 a year to pay forhealth care reform goes into effect in 2013.

This once again will give the United States one of the highest dividend tax rates in the industrialized world.

Long-term capital gains will be taxed at a 20% rate rather than the current 15% rate, though again, for couples who earn more than $250,000 a year, the additional 3.9% medical-reform tax also will be imposed, still far lower than the rate on dividend income.

Some academics have long argued that taxing dividends is unfair because it taxes at the individual-shareholder level income that already has been taxed at the corporate level, as dividends are paid out of after-tax corporate profits. Some also argue that by favoring capital gains over dividends through lower tax rates, tax policy could encourage companies to pursue growth at any cost to generate the capital gains.

Those in favor of taxing dividends as ordinary income argue that it is unfair social policy to tax income generated from work more highly than income generated from investing. In response, those opposed to the dividend taxes argue that the dividend income often results from years of saving and investing the after-tax income generated from work.

Whatever the merits of these arguments, the changing tax treatment of dividends no doubt will produce changes in investors' behavior — and possibly in the behavior of corporations.

The increase in the taxes on dividend income, besides encouraging investors to favor capital gains over dividends and driving down the stock prices of dividend stocks, might encourage more investors to favor tax-exempt bonds.

However, the prospect of higher inflation that is likely to result from unprecedented federal spending and the easy money policies of the Federal Reserve makes municipal bond investing a risky strategy. Inflation could drive up interest rates, reducing the value of existing bonds, while at the same time eroding the purchasing power of the current interest payments.

Corporations will feel less pressure to increase dividends and may even reduce them to husband capital for use in financing faster growth and generating capital gains.

This tax change and the turmoil likely to result from it offer no consolation to investors. It does, however, enhance the value of accountants, financial planners and investment advisers who help their clients wade through it.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Mar 13

Conference

WOMEN to WATCH

InvestmentNews is honoring female financial advisers and industry executives who are distinguished leaders at their firms. These women have advanced the business of providing advice through their passion, creativity, inclusive approach and... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

When can advisers expect an SEC fiduciary rule proposal and other regs this year?

Managing editor Christina Nelson and senior reporter Mark Schoeff Jr. discuss regulations of consequence to financial advisers in 2018, and their likely timing.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

El-Erian warns advisers on ETF liquidity

If investors decide to exit exchange-traded funds en masse, things could get nasty, economist says.

Fidelity charging new fee on Vanguard assets held in 401(k) plans

The 0.05% fee is ostensibly a response to Vanguard's distribution model, but may also make the company's funds less attractive due to higher cost.

UBS adviser count continues to decline

Firm to merge U.S., global wealth management units on Feb. 1

TD Ameritrade launches all-night trading for ETFs

Twelve funds now can be traded after-hours, but the list will grow, company says.

Cutting through the red tape of adviser regulation is tricky

Don't expect a simple rollback of rules under the Trump administration in 2018 — instead, regulators are on pace to bolster financial adviser oversight.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print