NFL players at risk of financial roughing

Recent schemes against Elway, Vick throw union's approved-adviser list into spotlight

Oct 31, 2010 @ 12:01 am

By Bruce Kelly

Several current and former National Football League players recently have found themselves ensnared in alleged Ponzi schemes or legal battles over failed investments.

Last month, former Denver Broncos quarterback John Elway re-vealed that he and his business partner gave $15 million to a hedge fund manager now accused of running a Ponzi scheme.

In September, Alex Brown, a defensive end for the New Orleans Saints, sued his team of investment advisers over $3.9 million in losses, alleging they had “abused the trust” of Mr. Brown and his wife, “and embarked on schemes intended to enrich themselves at the expense” of the couple, including bad investments in airplane hangars.

Also in September, financial adviser Mary Wong pleaded guilty to stealing more than $3 million from investors, including Eagles quarterback Michael Vick and several other NFL players, in a Ponzi scam.

These cases come as the NFL Players Association, the union representing 1,800 players, looks to strengthen the screening process for its financial adviser program, which has come under attack in recent years.

Indeed, NFL players, like all professional athletes and high-net-worth individuals, are highly susceptible to being taken advantage of when it comes to investing their money, observers say.

And professional athletes often are susceptible to the siren call of the “inside deal,” and believe that brokers and advisers have access to such privileged, back-room knowledge, said Arthur Grant, chief executive of independent-contractor broker-dealer Cadaret Grant & Co. Inc.

“They believe the myth that Wall Streeters can double their money in six months, and only if they can get in that private game, they could do that too,” he said.

Started in 2002 — after adviser William “Tank” Black was convicted of stealing $11 million from players he represented — the program requires that advisers have appropriate financial qualifications, such as a certified financial planner mark or registration with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc., to be included on a select list for players.

Advisers must also undergo a background check, and pay $1,500 to be included on the list and $500 annually to remain on it. There are currently about 450 advisers on the list. The list includes a disclaimer, indicating that the advisers are neither endorsed nor recommended.

In an open case originally filed in 2006, five players are suing the NFLPA over its oversight of the approved list of advisers, alleging that it was negligent in vetting reps.

The league, which runs background checks on advisers, is also named in that lawsuit.

The case centers on a jailed hedge fund manager, Kirk Wright, who stole more than $150 million from clients, including several NFL players, and eventually killed himself in prison. The case was dismissed late last year in a Georgia state court, but the players, including former All-Pro safety Steve Atwater, appealed the decision last spring.

The lawsuit alleges that Mr. Wright was on the adviser list even though he should have been disqualified because liens had been filed against him.

“I'm assuming our case is getting the NFL and the NFL Players Association to review their [adviser] programs,” said Quentin Williams, one of the attorneys representing the five players.

It's unclear if any of the advisers involved in the most recent round of alleged frauds victimizing NFL stars were on the NFLPA's list.

Carl Francis, a spokesman for the union, declined to comment on the recent cases or the lawsuit involving Mr. Wright. He also said the adviser list is private and available only to players.

Mr. Francis added that the union is planning to place more emphasis on financial education for the players.

In July, Dana Hammonds, director of financial programs and adviser administration for the union, told InvestmentNews that the union is in the process of crafting new qualifications which advisers must meet to get on the list.

Greg Aiello, a spokesman for the NFL, did not return calls seeking comment.

TARGETS FOR PREDATORS

One of the major issues is that athletes often rely on referrals from their inner circle. That trust — along with some athletes' lack of sophistication with money — can easily be taken advantage of.

“There are predators out there who are focused on athletes,” said Mr. Williams, the attorney suing the NFL and the player's union in the Kirk Wright case.

E-mail Bruce Kelly at bkelly@investmentnews.com.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

May 02

Conference

Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in four cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

Advisers beware: tax law has unintended consequences

Commission accounts could be preferable for some clients, and advisers could be incentivized to move from employee broker-dealers to independent channels.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Bond investors have more to worry about than a government shutdown

Inflation worries, international rates pushing Treasuries yields higher.

Morgan Stanley reports a loss of advisers after exiting the protocol for broker recruiting

The firm said it lost 47 brokers in the fourth quarter, the most in any quarter of 2017.

Morgan Stanley's wealth management fees climb to all-time high

Improvement reflect firm's shift of more clients into fee-based accounts priced on asset levels, which boosts results as markets rise.

Legislation would make it harder for investors to sue mutual funds over high fees

A plaintiff would have to state in their initial complaint why fiduciary duty was breached, and then prove the violation with 'clear and convincing evidence.'

Relying on trainees, Merrill Lynch boosts adviser headcount in 2017

Questions remain about long-term effectiveness of wirehouse's move away from recruiting experienced brokers.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print