Goldman halts Facebook offering to U.S. clients

Jan 17, 2011 @ 2:43 pm

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. halted an offering of Facebook Inc. shares to U.S. investors on concern that “intense media attention” on the deal may violate rules limiting marketing of private securities.

Instead, the sale, first reported Jan. 2, will be restricted to non-U.S. investors, the New York-based bank said in an e-mailed statement today. Goldman Sachs and funds it manages had agreed to buy $450 million of closely held Facebook before the bank began seeking investors.

“Goldman Sachs concluded that the level of media attention might not be consistent with the proper completion of a U.S. private placement under U.S. law,” it said in the statement. The move “was based on the sole judgment of Goldman Sachs and was not required or requested by any other party.”

Goldman Sachs, the biggest U.S. securities firm before converting to a bank in 2008, had been trying to sell as much as $1.5 billion in Facebook shares to investors inside and outside the U.S. before making the change announced today. The company didn’t say whether it still expects to raise that amount. The target is still achievable, according to a person with knowledge of the bank’s plan who declined to be identified because it isn’t public.

Client Disappointment

“Goldman’s U.S. clients will be disappointed,” said Randy Hawks, a managing director of Oakland, California-based venture capital firm Claremont Creek Ventures, which has $300 million under management.

A Facebook spokesman, Jonathan Thaw, said Goldman Sachs is “in the best position to answer any questions.”

“It certainly is not going to be happy for the people who put the time into analyzing the investment and didn’t get any,” said Peter Hahn, a lecturer on corporate finance at Cass Business School in London. “But this transaction seems like a unique enough one that it’s hard to think there will be any long-lasting damage” for Goldman Sachs.

The limited sale may raise questions about whether it makes sense for the U.S. to restrict marketing of securities offerings that are only for sophisticated investors, Hahn said.

“Does this suggest that U.S. laws are prohibiting a certain group of investors from funding U.S. companies?” he said. “You might see some significant U.S. investors suggest that this is a negative for the U.S. economy.”

If Goldman Sachs had proceeded with the sale to U.S. investors, there was a risk that regulators could later conclude that media coverage had violated rules for a private placement, said the person with knowledge of the bank’s decision. If that had happened after the deal, Facebook might have been told to repurchase shares or register as a public company, the person said.

In its statement, Goldman Sachs said “we regret the consequences of this decision, but Goldman Sachs believes this is the most prudent path to take.”

--Bloomberg

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Events

Retirement: It's no longer about feeding pigeons from a park bench.

Today's retirees expect so much more from retirement than previous generations, and advisers are in prime position to help their clients understand what's important and what's not.

Latest news & opinion

Morgan Stanley CEO is happy that brokers are staying put

Firm has seen little attrition since it dumped the broker protocol last fall, Gorman says.

Bills to reform adviser regulation, increase sophisticated investors and protect seniors pass House

Measures included in package of 32 bipartisan bills meant to ease rules, spur investment

Genstar Capital buys majority stake in Cetera Financial Group

The private-equity firm has previously invested in such companies as Mercer Advisors and AssetMark.

Cetera Financial Group close to announcing its acquisition by private equity

Details of sale to one or more P-E firms could be announced as early as today.

10 best states for retirement

When it comes to places to retire, here are the 10 best states for enjoying your golden years.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print