Investment Insights

Jeff Benjamin

Large-cap-growth stocks finally move center stage

If history is a guide, the pendulum may be swinging away from small-caps

Jan 23, 2011 @ 12:01 am

At this stage in the market cycle, big and boring large-cap-growth stocks look like the place to be. Despite lagging behind smaller-company stocks since the March 2009 low point, the large-cap-growth category is due to gain favor, according to quantitative and historical analysis of the category.

“I am hearing from a lot of managers about all the values in the large-cap space,” said David Kathman, a senior mutual fund analyst at Morningstar Inc.

Granted, this theme has been in place for much of the past year as the biggest companies have cut costs, stockpiled cash and boosted earnings. And relatively speaking, the market has yet to reward large-cap companies for their efforts — and in part, that's why they look promising.

Consider large-caps' recent relative underperformance.

From the March 2009 low through the end of last year, the small-cap-oriented Russell 2000 Growth Index produced an annualized return of 57.7%, while the Russell Midcap Index had an annualized return of 56.1%.

By contrast, the large-cap Russell Top 200 Index gained 39.2% and the Russell Top 50 Index gained 35.1%.

A similar pattern prevails at the mutual fund level.

Last year, while the average mid-cap-growth fund gained 24.6% and the average small-cap fund gained 27%, the average large-cap-growth mutual fund tracked by Morningstar gained 15.5%.

The $1.1 billion T. Rowe Price New America Growth Fund (PRWAX), which was among Morningstar's “analyst picks” and gained 19.3% last year, is an example of how some large-cap managers generated performance: It allocated 34.5% of its portfolio to mid-cap stocks and 3% to small-caps.

So why is now the time for large-caps?

“Typically, during the third act of a bull market, which is where I believe we are now, there are going to be swings in leadership,” said David Rolfe, chief investment officer at Wedgewood Partners Inc., a $900 million asset management firm.

Compare current and historical price-earnings ratios of stocks across multiple categories, and you may see where that leadership is headed.

According to J.P. Morgan Asset Management, the current 14.6 P/E of large-cap-growth stocks is 31% below the category's 20-year average P/E, making it the most discounted of the nine style box categories. Perhaps not so surprising, small-cap-value stocks, which have a current P/E of 14 and a historical average P/E of 14.1, represent the most fairly valued category.

In a report last month by Grantham Mayo Van Otterloo & Co. LLC, the investment firm predicted that small-cap U.S. stocks would generate annual returns of -1.9%, adjusted for inflation, over the next seven years. The next worst-performing asset class, according to the report, will be international-small-cap stocks, expected to lose 1.4% a year.

The report had U.S. large-caps in general gaining 0.4% annually over the same period, and U.S. “high quality” stocks gaining 4.9% annually.

Ultimately, as Mr. Rolfe pointed out, the current valuations suggest that the market isn't expecting much from large-cap stocks but is expecting too much from small-caps.

With history as a guide, it is usually better to go with the less appreciated investment category.

As illustrated by the Leuthold Group LLC's research, even going with the second-best-performing asset class from the prior year is better than a pure momentum strategy of latching onto last year's winner.

In comparing the performance of the best-performing sector to that of the second-best performer, or “bridesmaid category,” from 1991 through 2010, Leuthold found that owning the prior year's best sector produced an annualized return of 5.5% the following year, while owning the bridesmaid sector, which outperformed the best-performing sector 14 of the 20 years, would have resulted in an annualized gain of 12.7%.

Bottom line: At this stage in the market cycle, it is likely that the pendulum has swung too far in the direction of small- and mid-caps, which means that financial advisers should be wary about letting clients chase last year's winners.

Questions, observations, stock tips? E-mail Jeff Benjamin at


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

May 31


Spring Excell—Peak Advisor Alliance

Members of the InvestmentNews Research team will be presenting new adviser benchmarking data and providing strategies that can help accelerate the growth of your business. In this exclusive three-hour workshop, InvestmentNews will... Learn more

Featured video


Advisor Group's Jamie Price: The real reason why most advisers don't have a succession plan in place

Eighty percent of advisers do not have a succession plan in place, though about half of them already know they will need to transition their businesses within the next 10 years, according to Jamie Price, president and CEO of Advisor Group.

Latest news & opinion

Wells Fargo Advisors restricting investments for retirement accounts

Mutual fund sales will be limited to T shares, while municipal bonds, preferred stock and international debt will be prohibited.

Morgan Stanley joins competitors in cutting back on recruiting

Wirehouse said it intends to increase its investment in existing talent.

DOL Fiduciary Rule: What you need to know about Acosta's decision

Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta confirmed that the agency's fiduciary rule will become applicable on June 9. Find out what advisers and firms should know when it goes into effect.

Acosta declines to extend delay of DOL fiduciary rule

Labor Secretary finds no legal basis to delay implementation; rule to become applicable June 9


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print