Fiduciary duty skepticism crosses the aisle

Dems now calling for cost-benefit analysis as well

May 18, 2011 @ 3:39 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

Although Capitol Hill Republicans have received the most attention for trying to halt work on fiduciary duty regulations, Democrats have also expressed skepticism over the issue.

In a recent letter to the Department of Labor, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the New Democrat Coalition asked the labor agency to try again on a rule that would broaden the definition of a fiduciary for retirement plans.

The proposed regulation — issued in October 2010 — sought to streamline the five-part fiduciary test that critics say makes it too easy for fund advisers to escape fiduciary requirements. A two-day hearing at the Employee Benefits Security Administration in early March drew many investment industry witnesses who warned that the rule was flawed.

In its May 10 letter, the New Democrat Coalition asserted that the rule should be modified because the original proposal would limit access to investment education and information.

“This would result in worse investment decisions by participants and would, in turn, increase the costs of investment products, services and advice that are absolutely critical parts of a sound investment strategy for consumers,” the group of 29 centrist Democrats wrote.

It's not clear whether their qualms about the Department of Labor's fiduciary rule extend to a potential SEC regulation that would impose a universal fiduciary duty on anyone providing retail investment advice.

“The [coalition] members are waiting to see how the SEC is going to interpret the intent of [the] Dodd-Frank [Act],” an aide to one of the New Democrat leaders, who was not authorized to speak on the record, wrote in an email. “The primary concern right now is DOL's proposed definition of fiduciary duty and potential impact on access to investment advice for IRA participants, plans and others.”

Another House Democratic did address a potential SEC fiduciary rule in a March letter to the agency.

“I would urge the Commission, before it moves forward with a proposed rule, to conduct an overall cost-benefit analysis regarding consumer preferences and access to affordable products so that it can assess the impact a uniform standard might have on retail investors and the advice they receive from financial professionals,” wrote Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y.

That stance puts Ms. Maloney in the same position as her Republican colleagues on the House Financial Services Committee, who also have called on the agency to conduct a cost-benefit study before proceeding to a regulation, which it is authorized to do under the Dodd-Frank Act.

But Ms. Maloney is not insisting on an economic analysis as a way to scuttle a fiduciary rule, according to her staff. It's just a standard metric that she wants to see produced.

In fact, following a recent Capitol Hill news conference in which Democratic leaders criticized Republicans for trying to undo Dodd-Frank, Ms. Maloney endorsed an SEC fiduciary duty rule.

“They need to move forward and protect consumers,” Ms. Maloney said. “What we're seeing [from Republicans] is almost a case of ‘let's pretend the financial crisis never happened.'”

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Events

3 Questions to ask yourself when making your succession plan

Michael Futterman from Janus Henderson Investors has sage advice for advisers as they approach retirement.

Latest news & opinion

The power of philanthrophy shifts to women, and advisers are taking notice

Philanthropic women are growing in number — and stature.

Cetera brokers may go elsewhere with no stay bonuses on horizon

Some may feel spurned and leave, while others will simply shrug off latest slight and stay.

Fidelity backs away from being 'point in time' fiduciary for 401(k) plans

Some advisers think this indicates other providers will pivot in light of DOL fiduciary rule's death.

Morgan Stanley CEO is happy that brokers are staying put

Firm has seen little attrition since it dumped the broker protocol last fall, Gorman says.

Bills to reform adviser regulation, increase sophisticated investors and protect seniors pass House

Measures included in package of 32 bipartisan bills meant to ease rules, spur investment

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print