A big private placements win for broker-dealer J.P. Turner

Judge decides J.P. Turner & Co. was not required to perform due diligence on stock from Provident Royalties; precedent could boost other besieged broker-dealers

May 19, 2011 @ 2:53 pm

By Bruce Kelly

In what can only be viewed as a surprise outcome, an independent broker-dealer has won a rare legal victory in the ongoing scrum over private placements that has forced several broker-dealers to shut down.

In federal court in Atlanta on Tuesday, a judge dismissed a class action against J.P. Turner & Co LLC, one broker-dealer among dozens that sold Provident Royalties LLC, an outfit which packaged oil and gas deals and was charged with fraud in 2009 by the Securities and Exchange Commission. While some broker-dealers recently have defeated individual arbitration claims stemming from failed private placements, J.P. Turner is the only broker-dealer to have a putative class action against it dismissed, said Terry Weiss, an attorney for the firm.

Significantly, U.S. District Court Judge Julie E. Carnes of the Northern District of Georgia agreed with J.P. Turner that no facts or legal authority had been cited to support the investors' allegation that the B-D owed a duty to confirm the accuracy of Provident's statements in the private placement memoranda, Mr. Weiss said. According to the court order, Ms. Carnes did not find “any Georgia authority that imposes a duty on a broker to conduct due diligence concerning the investment materials it provides to clients."

The decision could have a positive impact on broker-dealers facing other complaints stemming from investor losses in Provident Royalties, said Mr. Weiss, a partner with Greenberg Traurig LLP. “This is the first time [in the Provident class action litigation] where the judge actually decided the issue that a brokerage firm, which was not an underwriter of the securities — did not owe the kinds of duties and due-diligence obligations that were alleged in the complaint,” Mr. Weiss said.

“I don't believe the courts in other cases got to that question,” he said. “I think this is a significant win.”

Other investor lawsuits against broker-dealers over Provident Royalties and another failed series of private placement, Medical Capital Holdings Inc., are winding their way through federal courts in Texas and California. Regulators, including several states, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc., also have investigated or sued broker-dealers that sold the products. Many broker-dealers that sold the products – including QA3 Financial Corp., GunnAllen Financial Inc. and Okoboji Financial Services Inc. — have gone out of business or moved to settle class actions because of the crushing legal costs of investor lawsuits.

In total, Provident Royalties raised $485 million from investors before collapsing in early 2009. It filed for bankruptcy protection a few weeks before the SEC charged it with fraud. It now is in receivership. J.P. Turner sold the preferred stock of Provident from September 2006 to January 2009, according to the lawsuit. (Click here for a list of 50 indie B-Ds that sold Provident, as well as the commissions earned.)

The suit was filed against J.P. Turner in September 2009. Investors Ron Brown and Vivian Garcia alleged that the firm was “guilty of failing to disclose a multitude of material facts, which J.P. Turner was, or should have been aware of,” according to the complaint.

The material facts that they alleged included:

ˆ Provident allegedly commingled investor funds.

ˆ Money raised from the offerings allegedly was not invested as stated in private placement memoranda.

ˆ Money from clients who invested in later Provident offerings were being used to pay dividends and returns of capital to other investors, a classic sign of a Ponzi scheme, the complaint said.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

B-D Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' B-D Data Center to find exclusive information and intelligence about the independent broker-dealer industry.

Rank Broker-dealers by

Upcoming Event

Apr 30


Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video


Top questions surrounding future of DOL fiduciary rule

Reporter Greg Iacurci and managing editor Christina Nelson discuss the biggest uncertainties springing from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision to vacate the regulation.

Latest news & opinion

What the next market downturn means for small RIAs

Firms that have enjoyed AUM growth because of the runup in stocks may find it hard to adjust to declining revenues if the market suffers a major correction.

DOL fiduciary rule likely to live on despite appeals court loss

Future developments will hinge on whether the Labor Department continues the fight to remake the regulation its own way.

DOL fiduciary rule: Industry reacts to Fifth Circuit ruling

Groups on both sides of the fiduciary debate had plenty to say.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacates DOL fiduciary rule

In split decision, judges say agency exceeded authority.

UBS, after dumping the broker protocol, continues to see brokers come and go

The wirehouse has seen 14 individuals or teams leave and five join for a net loss of $2.4 billion in AUM


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print