Don't expect fiduciary proposal this year: SEC insider

Ramped-up cost-benefit analysis gumming up the works; ‘time frame certainly has slipped'

Sep 19, 2011 @ 1:52 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

While the Labor Department today announced that is starting over on its fiduciary-duty rule, an insider at the Securities and Exchange Commission said the agency likely will delay issuing its new standard of care for broker-dealers.

The regulator had said that it would promulgate a revamped fiduciary regulation sometime this fall. But in an appearance Thursday before the House Financial Services Committee, SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro hinted that the agency is not ready to use the authority given to it by the Dodd-Frank financial reform law to establish a universal standard of care for retail investment advice.

“We have not yet proposed to go forward with a specific rule at this time,” Ms. Schapiro told lawmakers.

In an interview with InvestmentNews, an SEC official confirmed the delay.

“The time frame certainly has slipped,” said the official, who asked not to be identified, as the rule that has not yet been proposed. “It's extremely unlikely that there will be a rule this year. We are very determined to get it right. We're quite engaged with interested parties.”

The SEC has been under pressure from fiduciary-duty skeptics to justify the benefits of a new rule. In January, the SEC delivered a staff report to Congress recommending that the commission proceed with such a regulation to better protect investors who are confused by the differing standards that investment advisers and broker dealers must meet.

Two commissioners — Kathleen Casey and Troy Paredes — dissented with the report, asserting that it does not include a sufficient economic analysis to justify its conclusion. Since then, Capitol Hill Republicans have picked up that theme, pressing the SEC not to proceed on fiduciary duty until doing a thorough cost-benefit calculation.

In July, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated an SEC rule on proxy access because the court said that the agency had “failed once again … adequately to assess the economic effects of a new rule.”

An effort to bolster the agency's approach to economic analysis is one factor slowing a potential fiduciary-duty rule.

“We are spending tons of time on re-evaluating how we did cost-benefit historically,” the SEC official said. “And that is going to take longer.”

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Events

Are investors getting complacent?

Tom Florence, CEO of 361 Capital, discusses growing investor complacency and why he thinks overconfidence might be creeping into adviser and investor decision making.

Latest news & opinion

Meet our 2017 Women to Watch

Introducing 20 female financial advisers and industry executives who are distinguished leaders, advancing the business of providing advice through their creativity and hard work.

Raymond James executives call on industry to keep broker protocol

Also ask firms to pay for the administration of the protocol to 'ensure its longevity and relevance.'

Senate committee approves tax plan but full passage not assured

Several Republican senators expressed reservations about the bill, and the GOP cannot afford too many defections.

House passes tax bill, focus turns to Senate

Tax reform legislation expected to have more of a challenge in upper chamber.

SEC enforcement of advisers drops in Trump era

The agency pursued 82 cases against advisers and firms in fiscal year 2017, down from 98 the previous year.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print