Tough Finra proposal aims to bring nontraded-REIT pricing up to par

Regulator wants commissions subtracted right away from value shown on statements; 'pendulum has swung too far'

Sep 29, 2011 @ 3:11 pm

By Bruce Kelly

+ Zoom
((Photo: Lobstar28))

A new Finra proposal would drastically change how the value of nontraded real estate investment trusts appears on client account statements — a nettlesome issue for independent broker-dealers that sell the products and the sponsors that create them.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. today proposed changes to its Rule 2340, which governs customer account statements. Finra's new proposal takes aim at brokers' commissions and other upfront costs.

It would require that “all per-share estimated values, including those that are based on the offering price, reflect a deduction of all organization and offering expenses (net value).”

That means that the customer of a broker who buys a nontraded REIT for par, typically $10 a unit, would receive an initial account statement, minus the broker's commissions and other expenses. In such instances, those nontraded REITs would be valued at $8.70 a unit.

Broker-dealers and sponsors of nontraded REITs have long anticipated the rule proposal, but the proposal's emphasis on immediately deducting brokers' and firms' commissions from the value on a client's account statement alarmed at least one industry consultant.

“Once again, the pendulum has swung too far,” said Bryan Mick, a due-diligence consultant who evaluates nontraded REITs and private placements. “Nontraded REITs have significant upfront or sunk costs, and the initial costs should be amortized over the holding period of the REIT, which spans years, not by its second day.”

Nancy Condon, a Finra spokeswoman, had no comment about Mr. Mick's comments.

The Finra rule proposal includes both potential changes for nontraded REITs and direct participation programs that broker-dealers sell, usually in the form of limited partnerships. Both are illiquid investments that garnered the attention of securities regulators during and after the credit crisis.

Finra has been zeroing in on the issue of nontraded REIT valuations recently.

Currently, broker-dealers have a lengthy grace period during which nontraded REITs can remain at par before an estimated market value is established. Par value for most nontraded REITs is $10 a share, and a typical offering period is two years.

That $10-a-share value is listed on client account statements for those two years.

But REIT sponsors commonly extend the offering period to sell more shares to investors, pushing the deadline for an updated market valuation. Given the initial 18-month grace period, four or five years can pass before a nontraded REIT has to be given a market valuation, industry observers said.

And in 2009, Finra issued a notice to members that reminded them of their obligation to list an estimated value on client account statements 18 months after the offering is closed to new investors, rather than list the price or par value at which it was sold to investors.

In its new rule proposal, Finra would lesson that requirement. Its new amendment would require that an estimated per-share value to be no less current than the data in the offering's most current annual report.

Firms and other industry officials have until Nov. 12 to comment on Finra's proposal.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

INTV

Ed Slott: Many investors are still not using this IRA strategy to save on taxes

If you have a client who has an IRA that is subject to required minimum distributions and they're donating to charity, they should be using qualified charitable distributions, according to Ed Slott, founder of Ed Slott's Elite IRA Advisor Group.

Video Spotlight

Will It Last As Long As Your Clients Do?

Sponsored by Prudential

Video Spotlight

The Catalyst

Sponsored by Pershing

Latest news & opinion

Edward Jones is winning the Google search war

Brokerage firm's digital marketing investment helps land it at the top of local and overall search engine results, report finds.

Voya's win in 401(k) fee suit involving Financial Engines bodes well for other record keepers

Fidelity, Aon Hewitt and Xerox HR Solutions are currently defending against similar fiduciary-breach claims.

Collective investment trusts getting more attention from 401(k) advisers

The funds are catching on due largely to lower costs and more product availability, but come with some inherent drawbacks.

Vanguard rides robo-advice wave to $65B in assets

Personal Advisor Services, four times the size of its closest competitor, combines digital and human touch.

CFPs, including brokers, may have to adhere to a stricter fiduciary duty

CFP Board revises its standards and aims to beef up fiduciary requirements of certificants.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print