Most advisers overstating their expertise: Cerulli study

59% call themselves financial planners, but only 30% fit the bill in pattern of misrepresentation

By Jeff Benjamin

Jan 19, 2012 @ 3:36 pm (Updated 4:01 pm) EST

When pressed, it seems financial intermediaries will tend to overstate their qualifications and services, according to Cerulli Associates Inc.

“Most advisers don't want to say that they don't offer some kind of service, so they are more likely to overstate their capabilities,” said Scott Smith, a Cerulli analyst.

In studying the responses of more than 1,500 financial intermediaries, gathered over the past year as part Cerulli's annual quantitative-update report on the industry, Mr. Smith recognized a pattern of misrepresentation.

“We found that 59% of respondents were calling themselves full-scale financial planners, when it fact many of them were actually investment planners,” he said.

In Cerulli's parlance, which divides the overall financial intermediary universe into four broad categories, there are subtle yet distinct differences between an investment planner and a more comprehensive financial planner.

Even though 59% of respondents identified themselves as financial planners, Cerulli calculated that only 30% actually fit the definition of being better qualified and certified, working with clients to build comprehensive plans that include insurance and estate planning.

Investment planners, by comparison, focus on asset management, retirement and college savings plans but tend to offer more-modular-style plans.

According to Mr. Smith, only 22% of the 1,500 respondents identified themselves as investment planners. But when he went over the details of each respondent's business, Mr. Smith realized that 56% of respondents are actually investment planners.

Mr. Smith said much of the discrepancy could be attributed to that fact a lot of advisers view themselves as being more comprehensive than they actually are, simply because they believe they have the potential to be more comprehensive.

“Firms have encouraged their advisers to expand their advice relationships with clients; however, advisers tend to overstate the degree to which they are involved in the planning process,” he said. “The movement to extend advice services is likely being accelerated by turbulent markets, as advisers who base their value to investors on investment performance have suffered more than those with broad advice relationships.”

In the two remaining categories — money manager and wealth manager — Cerulli found that advisers have a more realistic perspective on the services they are providing.

Money managers, defined as mostly managing and building portfolios, were identified by Cerulli as representing 9% of the total universe, which was in line what survey respondents indicated.

It was similar in the wealth manager category, which includes advisers doing comprehensive planning for wealthier clients.

Cerulli identified 11% of respondents as wealth managers, which compares with 6% of survey respondents identifying themselves as such.

  @IN Wire

Apr 22 07:49PM
I really hope this doesn't mean every Pearl Paint store is closing. http://t.co/I9h2gMoCEu
Apr 22 07:23PM
The 5 Types of People You're Likely to Unfriend on Facebook http://t.co/VB6C2Bs0oU

Career Center

Explore your opportunities and be informed for your next move.

Company Type
Firm Type
Clearing Firm
Presented by

Most Watched Video

7:12The 2 biggest factors driving growth in active ETFs

Ugo W. Egbunike Dir. Of Business Development, ETF.com Greg Crawford Deputy Editor, InvestmentNews

Video Spotlight
1:47People are Living Longer. Good News or Bad News?

Sponsored by Oppenheimer Funds Inc.