Merrill Lynch loses $10.2M broker-pay case

Immediately petitions court to overturn Finra panel's decision; accuses chair of bias

Apr 4, 2012 @ 4:01 pm

By Dan Jamieson

Merrill Lynch Finra award broker pay
+ Zoom

Bank of America Merrill Lynch has lost no time appealing an adverse $10.2 million arbitration award.

Two former Merrill brokers, Tamara Smolchek and Meri Ramazio of Florida, sued Merrill for deferred compensation they lost after leaving for Morgan Stanley in November 2008.

A three-person Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. panel yesterday awarded Ms. Smolchek $4.3 million and Ms. Ramazio $875,000 in compensatory damages.

The panel also whacked the brokerage for $5 million in punitive damages and sanctioned Merrill for discovery abuse.

But shortly after the award came out yesterday, Merrill filed a petition with a federal court in Florida seeking to overturn the decision.

It claims it never got a fair hearing, and alleges bias on the part of the panel chairwoman, Bonnie Pearce.

In its court petition, the firm said Ms. Pearce failed to disclose that her husband was a plaintiff's attorney who has sued Merrill Lynch on behalf of brokers or customers in at least five cases, including a win against the firm for more than $1 million.

Ms. Pearce “demonstrated overt hostility toward Merrill Lynch,” the court filing said. “Her failure to disclose information suggesting possible bias [and her] rulings precluding Merrill Lynch from introducing relevant evidence critical to its defense” support the firm's request to vacate the award, it said.

The arbitration panel, in a sharply worded decision, said a Merrill Lynch committee that determines whether to vest departing brokers in their deferred pay was nothing “but a sham committee that did nothing more than rubber-stamp denials.”

The committee had never approved a request for vesting, despite Merrill's own analysis that it might have to pay “anywhere from hundreds of millions to several billion dollars in potential liability,” the award said.

“This decision is wrong and the amount of the award bears no relation to the damages at issue,” Merrill spokesman Bill Halldin said in a statement.

Finra spokeswoman Michelle Ong declined comment. InvestmentNews was unable to reach Ms. Pearce for comment.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video

Events

Inside the first robo ETF

When it comes to exchange-traded funds, innovations come in all shapes and sizes. Check out Robo Global's Bill Studebaker discussing the first robo ETF.

Video Spotlight

Are Your Clients Prepared For Market Downturns?

Sponsored by Prudential

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

HighTower faces pressure to let investors cash out

After an IPO planned for last year didn't happen, the company could opt to satisfy its backers with a sale.

Envestnet to buy FolioDynamix

The deal, which is expected to close in the first quarter of 2018, will bring the total assets Envestnet works with to almost $2 trillion.

Jerry Schlichter's fee lawsuits have left an indelible mark on the 401(k) industry

After a decade of litigation, fees are lower and retirement plans are more transparent. But have the lawsuits gone too far?

10 best financial adviser jokes

How many financial advisers does it take to screw in a lightbulb?

With margins crashing, broker-dealers look to merge: report

Increased regulation is straining profit margins among broker-dealers, sending many of them into the arms of their bigger brethren.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print