Advisers disagree with Kitces' take

May 13, 2012 @ 12:01 am

By Davis Janowski

A technology-centric advice business that could leave traditional planners “in the dust” — a future envisioned by adviser Michael Kitces — is unlikely to unfold, according to many financial advisers and industry observers.

The biggest competitors for planning clients in the future — especially for Generation Y prospects — will be tech companies and “virtual platforms” that give information-hungry investors the tools and advice that they seek, Mr. Kitces, director of research at Pinnacle Advisory Group, and an influential blogger, said last week at the Financial Planning Association's Retreat 2012 conference in Scottsdale, Ariz.

“Baloney,” volleyed Mark Hurley, president of Fiduciary Network LLC.

“Wealth managers are fundamentally financial physicians,” he said.

“You can't teach a machine to do that,” Mr. Hurley said, adding that years of experience and reasoning one's way through myriad and often unexpected complexities give advisers the perspective required to help clients.

Forrester Research Inc. analyst Bill Doyle said predictions that technology will usurp human advice are nothing new.

“The funny thing is that this has been happening for many years,” he said.

“Well before, for instance, there were many other services, like Financial Engines [Inc.], founded by Nobel laureate Bill Sharpe, which offered online advice. But that firm has tacked away from its original mission and today is addressing the 401(k) space,” Mr. Doyle said.

He noted that while many startups may be catching the imagination of the media and younger investors, one “old-guard firm,” Fidelity Investments, has been providing online advice for more than a decade through its Retirement Income Planner.

“It is not an all-or-nothing proposition,” said David Tittsworth, executive director of the Investment Adviser Association, who recalled that when he started in his position in 1996, there were virtually no advisory websites. Now everyone has a presence online.

“There is room for a lot of different models; the bottom line is that people are looking for trusted advisers and that those advisers need to adapt to their client's needs,” he said.

New offerings from Betterment LLC, HelloWallet, Personal Capital Technology Corp. and others shouldn't be seen as threats but rather as tools that should be adapted for use by advisers, observers said.

“It may sound kind of perverse, but these new services will benefit face-to-face advisers,” said Sheryl Garrett, founder of Garrett Planning Network Inc., a team of financial advisers who work primarily on an hourly basis.


“By making services available in a virtual or online low-cost, high-quality way, I actually see that as helping the industry grow,” she said, adding that among the Gen Y population, such tools are the preferred means of being introduced to planning.

In other instances, such as for those who live in rural areas, for example, online access may be the only game in town, or at least a likely conduit to video advising.

Perhaps more important, Ms. Garrett noted that these tools should be used by advisers to save them time on “grunt work,” including data entry.

As a stand-alone business, online advice has proved to be a difficult.

Boulevard R, which began in 2007 as an automated online system, has since morphed into a tool for advisers.

“Advice is a relationship-driven business, because as people's assets grow and investments get more complex, they want the human touch. That makes it hard for services that try to totally disintermediate the adviser,” said Matt Iverson, Boulevard R's chief executive.

Given that difficulty, hybrid models, such as that of startup Veritat Advisors, which mixes online tools with human advice through quarterly phone and online meetings, seem more likely to gain in popularity, Ms. Garrett said.

Market segmentation may provide direction, said Alois Pirker, research director at Aite Group LLC.

“When you go down to the investor with $250,000 in assets, the key is simple planning,” which technology can be taught to do, to a certain extent, he said.

“When you go upstream, clients are much more focused on particular problems that need to be solved. That's where you need a specialist,” Mr. Pirker said.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

RIA Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' RIA Data Center to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

Upcoming Event

Apr 30


Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video


3 tips when hiring millennials

Advisers want to add young talent, but ask if they want to add millennials and most will begin to squirm. Hunter Hart, and Marc Schliefer of Equity Planning Inc. disspell some myths and misconceptions of hiring millennials.

Video Spotlight

The Search for Income

Sponsored by PGIM Investments

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

How does your advisory firm stack up?

Comparing a firm's pay to the competition can point out vast flaws.

10 signs your client is cheating on you

Sure signs that clients may be on the way out the door.

Morgan Stanley sees slower fee-based asset flows on fiduciary rule delay

Flows to advisory accounts, while still higher than the start of 2016, dropped off more than 20% from Q2 and were the lowest in a year.

How adviser salaries stack up to other jobs

Median compensation hovers just under $100,000 on the low end and reaches nearly $300,000 for bosses.

Finra ranking brokers in effort to crack down on industry's bad apples

All 634.403 reps have been ranked based on factors such as prior regulatory disclosures, disciplinary actions and employment history.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print