Subscribe

Finra as SRO regulator a ‘foregone conclusion,’ says industry watcher

Finra Small sign, big job ahead

Hamburger thinks other options — the SEC, a new regulator — not viable; 'bad blood'

Whatever the fate of the Bachus bill currently being considered by the House Financial Services Committee, the question of who should regulate investment advisers is all but settled, according to Brian Hamburger, a securities lawyer and managing director of advisory consultant MarketCounsel.

“If an SRO for advisors gains approval, It’s a foregone conclusion that it will be Finra that regulates the industry,” Mr. Hamburger said during a panel discussion at the Pershing LLC’s Insite 2012 conference.

Despite growing criticism of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc.’s transparency, oversight record and compensation packages, Mr. Hamburger said there is no other viable option.

He noted that repairing and adequately funding the Securities and Exchange Commission to do the job more effectively might be the least costly alternative. That won’t happen, he predicted. “There is too much bad blood between Congress and the SEC.”

In the past, Mr. Hamburger has suggested that the industry itself could take on exams by hiring third-party auditors. SEC “user fees aren’t the only option” for paying for enhanced adviser exams, he said.

Others have backed creating a new self-regulatory organization to do the job. But Mr. Hamburger sees that as unlikely. He noted that the current version of the Bachus bill, which he described as the most important piece of legislation since the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, requires the entity to have full rule-making and enforcement powers. “A new SRO would have to go from 0 to 60 in no time,” he said. “They have to latch onto an existing regulator.”

Mr. Hamburger sympathized with an adviser in the audience who expressed dismay at the prospect of coming under Finra’s oversight.

“There’s no more difficult regulator to deal with than Finra. They’ve done a disservice to the brokerage industry by increasing the costs of doing business and reducing innovation,” he said. “My fear is that the same thing will happen with investment advisers.”

Finra had not comment on what was said during the panel discussion.

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Turning advice on its head

United Capital's Joe Duran is hellbent on changing the industry.

Florida advisers sue CFP Board

Husband and wife balk over a disciplinary case the board raised for using the term “fee-only” to describe their compensation.

BofA Merrill agrees to $39M gender discrimination settlement

Lawsuit alleged a "deep rooted and pervasive gender discrimination" existed at Bank of America and Merrill Lynch

Supremes give Schwab a boost over Finra in arbitration scuffle

A recent Supreme Court decision allowing class action waivers tips the scales in favor of Charles Schwab in its scuffle with Finra over the tactic.

DeWaay settles with Finra over sales practices

Pays fine, accepts suspension but B-D already closed, securities license dropped.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print