Estate tax a focus of fiscal-cliff debate

GOP irked that issue isn't in Senate Democratic bill

Jul 29, 2012 @ 12:01 am

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

When the Senate voted last Wednesday to pass controversial legislation extending some of the Bush administration tax cuts, it became clear that estate tax policy will be a focal point of the debate.

The Senate Democratic bill, which won approval by a vote of 51-48, would continue the tax cuts through 2013 for households earning less than $250,000 annually but allow them to revert to pre-2001 levels for those above that threshold. The bill follows the policy backed by President Barack Obama.

The measure doesn't address estate taxes, which are set at 35% with a $5 million exemption. If the Bush cuts expire at the end of the year without congressional action, the estate tax will increase to 55%, with a $1 million exemption.

The estate tax was left out of the Senate legislation because of disagreement among Senate Democrats about an appropriate rate. Some lawmakers up for re-election this year are nervous about the issue.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said that leaving the estate tax by the wayside threatens small businesses and farms.

“A vote for the Democrat plan is a vote to put these farms and ranches out of business,” he said on the Senate floor last Wednesday.

The other key point about the Democratic tax bill is that it would set capital gains and dividend taxes at 20% for all income levels, according to Dean Zerbe, national managing director of alliantgroup LP, a tax services firm, and former Republican tax counsel to the Senate Finance Committee.

Under Mr. Obama's approach, the capital gains rate would be 20% and dividends would be taxed as ordinary income for households making more than $250,000.

“You've got a clear signal right out of the gate that the [congressional] Democrats will be willing to tie dividend rates and capital gains rates,” Mr. Zerbe said.

Earlier last Wednesday, the Democrat-controlled Senate rejected a Republican tax bill.

Senate Republicans, however, are confident that the Democratic bill will die. They argue that it isn't viable because tax bills must start in the House.

This week, the House is expected to approve a bill that would extend all Bush tax cuts for a year.

There is no chance that the Republican-majority House would approve the Democratic-majority Senate's bill or vice versa. That leaves the fate of the Bush tax cuts, as well as domestic-spending reductions and other elements of the so-called fiscal cliff, to negotiations between legislators and the White House during a lame-duck session of Congress after the election.

One of the primary topics of negotiation could be the estate tax.

“The Democrats couldn't get agreement on the estate tax in their own caucus,” Mr. Zerbe said. “They're probably going to be more open to working with Republicans on taxpayer-friendly solutions to the estate tax.”

On the other side of the Capitol last Wednesday, Rep. Kevin Brady, R-Texas, said a bill he wrote that would end the estate tax has 218 bipartisan co-sponsors, or a House majority.

It isn't clear whether the legislation will receive a vote this year. A companion bill in the Senate has 37 Republican co-sponsors.

Also Wednesday, Mr. Brady, vice chairman and the top Republican on the Joint Economic Committee, released a report by the panel's GOP economists that says the estate tax has “reduced the amount of capital stock [buildings, equipment and software] in the U.S. economy by roughly $1.1 trillion since its introduction as a permanent tax in 1916,” according to a statement.

SAVINGS, INVESTMENT

During a conference call with reporters, Mr. Brady said that the estate tax has led to the dismantling of family businesses and has undermined savings and investment.

“Our economy and [tax] revenue would grow faster if the death tax were abolished,” he said during the call.

Some Democrats and liberal groups are pushing to raise the estate tax as a matter of what they call tax fairness. They contend that a low estate tax benefits the wealthy primarily.

mschoeff@investmentnews.com Twitter: @markschoeff

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

May 02

Conference

Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in four cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Latest news & opinion

One adviser's story of losing his son to the opioid epidemic

John W. Brower, president and CEO of JW Brower & Associates, shares the story behind his son's death from a heroin overdose and how it inspired him to help others break the cycle of addiction.

Tax reform will boost food, chemicals, rail stocks. Technology? Not so much

Conagra and Berkshire Hathaway are two stocks that should benefit most from changes in the tax code.

Brace for steepest rate hikes since 2006 in new year

Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase predict average interest rates across advanced economies will climb to at least 1 percent in 2018.

Why private equity wants a piece of the RIA market

Several factors, including consolidation in the independent advice industry and PE's own growing mountain of cash, are fueling the zeal to invest.

Finra bars former UBS rep for private securities transactions

Regulator says Kenneth Tyrrell engaged in undisclosed trades worth $13 million.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print