Washington INsider

Washington INsiderblog

Mark Schoeff Jr. looks at what's really happening on Capitol Hill - and the upshot for advisers.

Rift, rather the chasm, separates parties on investment-income taxes

'It all depends on your perspective'

Aug 3, 2012 @ 2:16 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

Although a chasm separates Democrats and Republicans over most of the Bush tax cuts, the difference between them on taxation of investment income is more of a rift.

Earlier this week, the staff of Rep. Sander Levin, D-Mich., ranking member of the House Ways and Means Committee, issued a “fact-check” press release to rebut claims by House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, who said that the bill passed by the Democratic Senate to extend the Bush breaks only for households earning less than $250,000 would hurt elderly Americans who depend on dividend income.

“The Senate-passed Democratic plan keeps the dividend rate at 15% on the first $250,000 of dividend income and holds the dividend rate at 20% on dividend income above $250,000,” the Ways and Means statement said. The Democratic plan would set capital gains at 20% for higher-income levels.

In seeking to extend all the Bush tax cuts for one year, Republicans want to keep both capital gains and dividends at a 15% rate for all income levels.

The two proposals are much closer than the distance between Republicans and Mr. Obama, who wants the dividend rate to snap back to the ordinary-income level.

That would mean that dividends would be taxed at about 44% for the highest earners. They would have to pay an income-tax rate of about 39% as well as the 3.8% tax on investment income imposed by health care reform.

The key movement over the last couple of weeks is that congressional Democrats “are prepared to keep the dividend tax rate the same as the capital gains tax rate,” said Andrew Friedman, principal at The Washington Update, which provides political and legislative analysis for investors and advisers.

Capitol Hill Democrats are taking a more practical view of investment taxation than Mr. Obama, according to Mr. Friedman. The president would like to see dividend taxes rise to stay in line with his effort to promote the so-called Buffet Rule, which would impose higher taxes on the wealthy.

“The Democrats in Congress are putting theory aside,” Mr. Friedman said. “They're saying, 'We don't want retirees in our districts who rely on dividend income to pay too high a tax on that.'”

Although a 5% difference on investment-income taxation may seem like a small amount, it could still become a major sticking point between Republicans and Democrats during fiscal-cliff talks in the lame-duck session of Congress later this year.

“In an era like this where everything is magnified, a tax increase of what may seem like a few points to one side is a big tax increase to the other side,” said Tim Steffen, senior vice president and director of financial planning at Robert W. Baird & Co. Inc. “It all depends on your perspective.”

The difference between Republicans and Democrats on the estate tax also is modest. The Republicans want to extend the current 35% rate and approximately $5 million exemption. House Ways & Means Democrats have introduced a bill that would set the top rate at 45% and the exemption at $3.5 million.

That separation, though, may turn out to be bigger in reality than it is on paper.

“Is the difference between $3.5 million and $5 million that big?” Mr. Steffen said. “It is if you're in that range.”

Democrats and Republicans are farther apart on the gift tax, with Democrats seeking a $1 million exemption and Republicans pushing for $5 million, according to Mr. Friedman.

He also warns that Congress may fall off the fiscal cliff, which would take the dividend rate beyond 40% and the estate tax rate to 55% with a $1 million exemption.

“You can't dismiss congressional deadlock and nothing getting passed,” Mr. Friedman said.

For lawmakers, a 5% difference could become a bridge too far.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Mar 13

Conference

WOMEN to WATCH

InvestmentNews is honoring female financial advisers and industry executives who are distinguished leaders at their firms. These women have advanced the business of providing advice through their passion, creativity, inclusive approach and... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

Why some retirement plan advisers think Fidelity is invading their turf

InvestmentNews editor Frederick P. Gabriel Jr. and reporter Greg Iacurci talk about this week's cover story that looks at whether Fidelity Investments is stepping on the toes of retirement plan advisers.

Latest news & opinion

Galvin's DOL fiduciary rule enforcement triggers industry plea for court decision

Plaintiffs warned the Fifth Circuit that Massachusetts' move against Scottrade signaled that the partially implemented regulation can raise costs for financial firms.

Social Security underpaid 82% of dually entitled widows and widowers

Agency failed to tell survivors that they could switch to a higher retirement benefit later.

Is Fidelity competing with retirement plan advisers?

As the Boston-based mutual fund giant expands the products and services it brings to the retirement market, some financial advisers say the firm is encroaching on their turf.

Gun violence hits investment strategies, sparks political debates with advisers

Screening out weapons companies has limited downside.

Whistleblower said to collect $30 million in JPMorgan case

The bank did not properly disclose that it was steering asset-management customers into investments that would be profitable for JPMorgan Chase.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print