Goldstein gives SEC an 'F' for Reg D stall

Hedgie skewers commission on delay in allowing advertising for private placements

Aug 27, 2012 @ 4:23 pm

By Dan Jamieson

In his own entertaining way, hedge fund manager and SEC critic Phillip Goldstein is urging the commission to get on with implementing the JOBS Act and move quickly to allow hedge funds to advertise.

In a sarcastic comment letter sent this weekend to the Securities and Exchange Commission, Mr. Goldstein told the agency to "ignore the wishes of Congress and president Obama [and] keep slowing down the rulemaking process."

The SEC is set to vote Wednesday on proposing controversial rules that would let issuers of private securities, including hedge funds, solicit the public. The rule change is mandated under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.

The agency had planned to implement immediate rules last week but backtracked on that move. It will instead vote on putting out a proposal for public comment.

SEC spokesman John Nester declined to comment on Mr. Goldstein's letter.

The debate over the Reg D proposal has come down to what verification procedures issuers will have to use to ensure they market private placements only to accredited investors.

Hedge funds have urged the SEC to let them continue to rely on signed statements from investors that they meet accreditation standards: a $1 million net worth and $200,000 annual income for single taxpayers, $300,000 for joint filers.

State securities regulators are pushing the SEC to require investor substantiation of financial status, such as tax and income records.

In an interview, Mr. Goldstein said any further hurdles are unnecessary.

"There's nothing wrong with a [verification] form" issuers use now, he said. "The only worry with it is about people willing to lie."

Mr. Goldstein describes a friend he calls Bernie, "an incurable risk-taker" who has lied on verification forms to invest in "can't-miss" private startups.

"If Bernie has to … answer a lot of detailed questions about his financial status, he will likely … take his money to Las Vegas," he wrote. Foregoing a “few hundred thousand jobs due to lack of capital is a small price to pay to save the countless truth-challenged Bernies out there."

In 2007, Massachusetts securities regulators charged Mr. Goldstein with violating the ban on solicitation of private placements. The state sought a $25,000 fine. He unsuccessfully challenged the action on free speech grounds and appealed the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, which this year declined to hear it.

Mr. Goldstein said the Supreme Court probably saw that the Jobs Act, signed into law in April, had made his case moot.

He said he has not paid the Massachusetts fine, and is asking the Massachusetts Securities Division to vacate the action.

The division is opposing the request.

Mr. Goldstein's argument "is based on specious arguments, including a modification in the federal law that in no way mitigates respondent's past violation," Massachusetts enforcers said in a formal reply this month.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Events

Behind the scenes at Pershing Insite 2018

What goes on behind the scenes at one of the industry's biggest conferences? Join us for an all-access sneak peak!

Latest news & opinion

Merrill Lynch fined $42 million for misleading customers

In addition to the practice of 'masking' trades, the wirehouse went to extremes to cover up the wrongdoing.

Advisers with billions in AUM leaving Wall Street

Merrill Lynch has seen two teams exit recently, each with more than $4 billion in client assets.

Wells Fargo weighs changes to wealth unit

The move would reflect the bank's effort to cut $4 billion in costs.

Small broker-dealers seek legislative relief from annual audits

Bills introduced in House, Senate would remove PCAOB requirement.

Meet our new 40 Under 40s

For a fifth year, InvestmentNews is proud to shine a spotlight on the amazing accomplishments and potential of top young financial professionals.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print