Subscribe

Facing possible estate tax, investors stick to sidelines

estate planning, taxes, LIMRA

Advisers urged to get proactive as exclusion could drop to $1 million, from $5 million

About 15 million households soon could end up with estate tax liabilities, but many wealthy individuals in this scenario are not yet putting plans in place to minimize them.
Today, individuals are allowed a $5.12 million federal estate tax exemption, with estates worth more than that subject to a top tax rate of 35%. Those provisions, however, are slated to expire Jan. 1, at which time — unless Congress acts — the exemption will revert to $1 million, with a 55% maximum tax.
A recent study from LIMRA found that 14.7 million U.S. households — 12.5% of the population — will be subject to a potential estate tax liability under the lower exemption levels. These affected families will have to pony up on average $1.4 million in taxes.
Still, it appears that few of those wealthy households are preparing their insurance portfolio to help buffer the tax hit. In fact, 55% of those families don’t have sufficient coverage to foot the tax bill, according to the study. On average, those families will still owe $1.6 million, according to LIMRA.
With three months left in the year, financial advisers and clients are sitting on the sidelines. They are uncertain about the direction Congress will take with the taxes, even though the nation’s massive deficit would seem to make the case for higher estate taxes. As a result, there’s a lot of hesitation to commit just yet to a life insurance strategy that could soften the tax bite.
“There’s a lot of ‘wait and see what happens,’” said Jim Swink, vice president of Raymond James Insurance Group. “Estate planning for the last several years has needed to be flexible. We don’t want to do too many things that are totally irrevocable.”
Mr. Swink added that the wealthiest individuals are putting together their philanthropic and charitable plans — especially with higher limits on gifts that permit people to give as gifts to others up to $13,000 tax-free — but the clients with $3 million to $5 million in assets are the ones who are sitting on the fence.
Indeed, going through all the work to establish an irrevocable life insurance trust to foot the tax bill could prove useless if exemptions remain at the higher levels.
However, as the year draws to a close, advisers might want to begin discussing with clients the potential for higher estate tax liability.
“It’s a reason to have a conversation, because not a lot of people are going to be calling their adviser,” said Jim Mitchel, vice president of developmental research at LIMRA. “A good chunk of clients aren’t as aware as they should be.”

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

As indexed universal life sales climb, be sure to mind the risks

Advisers need to bear in mind that this cousin of traditional universal life insurance requires unique precautions.

Donald Sterling’s battle holds harsh lessons for advisers

The L.A. Clippers owner's fight with pro basketball highlights important tax and estate strategies that may surprise you.

Advisers fall short on implementation of long-term-care insurance

Most know it's a key part of retirement planning but lack in-depth knowledge when the need for care arises.

Broker-dealers face administrative hurdles in rollout of QLAC annuity

Confusion remains over who ensures the contract purchase meets Treasury's guidelines.

Finra arbitration panel awards $500,000 to former Morgan Stanley rep

Broker and wirehouse embroiled in a three-year dispute over a promissory note.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print