Finra taking a closer look at sellers of nontraded REITs

Oct 7, 2012 @ 12:01 am

By Bruce Kelly

Nontraded real estate investment trusts and potential shortcomings in how broker-dealers sell them are clearly in the cross hairs of examiners from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc.

Over the past two years, Finra examiners have scrutinized “numerous retail sellers of nontraded REITs,” according to comments made late last month by Susan Axelrod, executive vice president of member regulation sales practices at Finra.

"RED FLAGS'

“In several instances, Finra examiners have found that firms selling these products failed to conduct reasonable diligence before selling a product and failed to make a determination that the product was suitable for investors,” she said in prepared remarks to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association's Complex Products Forum.

“Finra examiners have noted that in the instances of REITs that have experienced financial difficulties, red flags existed and should have been considered by firms prior to the product being offered to firm clients.”

Independent broker-dealers' shortcomings in due diligence when selling complex, illiquid products have been a focus of Finra exams and fines since the market collapse of 2008. Finra recently has fined and sanctioned a handful of broker-dealers that sold two series of private placements that imploded in 2009 — Medical Capital Holdings Inc. notes and preferred shares of Provident Royalties LLC — citing shoddy due diligence.

Ms. Axelrod said that distributions, or dividends, of nontraded REITs also are on Finra's radar.

“Nontraded REITs may also borrow funds to make distributions if operating cash flow is insufficient,” she said. “Excessive borrowing may increase the risk of default or devaluation. In addition, nontraded-REIT distributions may actually be a return of principal.”

Financial advisers “must use caution when discussing distributions with investors, particularly when making comparisons to other dividend-paying investments,” she said.

Some broker-dealers, meanwhile, have failed to conduct adequate training for the advisers who sell the products, Ms. Axelrod said.

“Finra examiners are also reviewing advertising, sales literature and correspondence between brokers and investors, and — in some instances — have found misrepresentations of product features, such as distributions and share values,” she said. “All of these issues raise investor protection concerns.”

bkelly@investmentnews.com Twitter: @bdnewsguy

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Events

3 tips when hiring millennials

Advisers want to add young talent, but ask if they want to add millennials and most will begin to squirm. Hunter Hart, and Marc Schliefer of Equity Planning Inc. disspell some myths and misconceptions of hiring millennials.

Video Spotlight

The Search for Income

Sponsored by PGIM Investments

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

E*Trade acquiring custodian Trust Company of America

Discount broker buying second-tier custodian for $275 million.

Another thousand Dow points higher, and investors yawn

Market milestones keep falling like dominoes, with 51 records broken so far this year.

LPL retains $570 million with super-OSJ deal

Kansas-based nVision Wealth will come under supervision of Chicago-based IHT Wealth Management.

How does your advisory firm stack up?

Comparing a firm's pay to the competition can point out vast flaws.

10 signs your client is cheating on you

Sure signs that clients may be on the way out the door.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print