Fiduciary Corner

Blaine F. Aikin

Enforcement of securities laws a must

SEC's Aguilar lays out compelling steps needed to restore investor trust in financial services

Oct 28, 2012 @ 12:01 am

By Blaine F. Aikin

There is a crisis of investor confidence in the integrity of financial market participants and regulators.

Although there are many underlying causes of the crisis, financial misconduct is clearly one that is both prominent and able to be remedied.

Speaking at the Securities Enforcement Forum 2012 this month, Securities and Exchange Commission member Luis Aguilar called for action to institute more-robust enforcement of securities laws, including legislation to increase the penalties for misconduct dramatically.

Noting that “trust is the foundation of the capital markets,” he framed compelling arguments as to why change is necessary and steps that need to be taken to help restore investor confidence and trust.

The following statistics cited by Mr. Aguilar are drawn from three recent studies that speak volumes about the weakened state of the trust-based foundation of the capital markets:

• Seventy-nine percent of investors have no trust in the financial system (“Too Big To Trust,” Chicago/Kellogg Financial Trust Index, in July).

• Fifty-two percent have no confidence in the management of public companies, and 54% have no confidence in public company boards of directors (The Center for Audit Quality's sixth annual Main Street Investor Survey, in September).

• Sixty-four percent of Americans think that corporate misconduct was a significant factor in bringing about the current economic crisis (The 2012 Ethics and Action Survey: Voices Carry, in September).

• Sixty-one percent of investors have no confidence in government regulators (Financial Trust Index), and 81% don't think that the government has done enough to stop corporate wrongdoing (CAQ survey).

Effective enforcement of securities laws, though not a cure for the crisis of confidence, must be part of a comprehensive plan to recover from the advanced state of decline in trust.


Mr. Aguilar prescribes attention to three key elements of an effective enforcement program: (1) individual accountability, (2) a maximum deterrence strategy and (3) special attention to recidivists.

Individual accountability involves focusing enforcement investigations on senior leaders at any organization involved in wrongdoing. Organizational accountability is important, but behind every breach of trust and violation of law are human acts of commission or omission for which the people involved must be held responsible.

Once again citing important studies, Mr. Aguilar said that a maximum deterrence strategy “turns on the severity of sanctions, the degree of certainty that sanctions will be imposed and the amount of time that lapses between the unlawful conduct and when the sanctions are imposed, and the extent of any extralegal consequences.”

The Stronger Enforcement of Civil Penalties Act of 2012, introduced by Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., would allow the SEC to issue per-violation penalties up to the greater of (1) $1 million for individuals (up from $150,000) and $10 million for firms (from $750,000), (2) three times the gross pecuniary gains or (3) the losses incurred by investors as a result of the violation.

Dodd-Frank expanded the SEC's authority to force bad actors out of the financial services industry. In addition to officer and director bars that have been available to the SEC, the commission can now issue collateral industry bars that prevent them from serving in the regulated securities industry in any role.

Career-ending bars from the industry carry enormous reputational and economic consequences, making these particularly effective deterrence measures.

Officer, director and industry bars relate directly to the third area of enforcement attention advocated by Mr. Aguilar: recidivists.

As in other areas of criminal activity, repeat offenders are responsible for a disproportionate amount of damage.

Mr. Aguilar has called for the SEC to “insist that every recidivist be subject to more-robust sanctions, including post-sanction monitoring ... that might include unscheduled office visits; access to phone records, bank records, and state and federal tax returns; and submission of periodic self-reports by the defendant.”

These are positive developments that promote a stronger fiduciary ethic in financial services, yet there is much more to be done to reduce financial misconduct and help restore the foundation of trust upon which our capital markets are built.

Blaine F. Aikin is chief executive of Fiduciary 360 LLC.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Apr 30


Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video


State Street's Brie Williams: The story behind the 'Fearless Girl' statue

The idea started with the creation of a statue to coincide with International Women's Day, and the results surpassed expectations, according to Brie Williams, head of practice management at State Street Global Advisors.

Video Spotlight

Will It Last As Long As Your Clients Do?

Sponsored by Prudential

Video Spotlight

The Catalyst

Sponsored by Pershing

Latest news & opinion

New military pension rules need financial advisers to step up and serve

Matching defined contribution plan expected to see more money, more need for sound advice.

Edward Jones is winning the Google search war

Brokerage firm's digital marketing investment helps land it at the top of local and overall search engine results, report finds.

Voya's win in 401(k) fee suit involving Financial Engines bodes well for other record keepers

Fidelity, Aon Hewitt and Xerox HR Solutions are currently defending against similar fiduciary-breach claims.

Collective investment trusts getting more attention from 401(k) advisers

The funds are catching on due largely to lower costs and more product availability, but come with some inherent drawbacks.

Vanguard rides robo-advice wave to $65B in assets

Personal Advisor Services, four times the size of its closest competitor, combines digital and human touch.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print