Technology Update

Advisers frustrated by lead generator

Growing pains, lack of leads reported by some advisers, MNFA fires some advisers trying to game the system

Oct 28, 2012 @ 12:01 am

By Davis Janowski

Only time will tell.

Although that is a cliché, my experience has been that only through observing the use of a technology-based service or tool over time can you accurately gauge its strengths and weaknesses.

Take MyNewFinancial Advisor.com, which I first wrote about in April. MNFA has been pursuing mass-affluent baby boomers with between $250,000 and $3 million in investible assets.

The lead-generation service's tech-centered approach to prospecting has left some financial advisers less than happy. Since June, I have spoken with several who have been frustrated by the service.

LACK OF LEADS

Ken Watten, a partner at Kaye Capital Management, signed up for an MNFA account in May and even purchased a syndicated subscription, only to become dissatisfied with the lack of leads.

Although the syndicated option he signed up for provides 50 leads over 12 months for $5,000, Mr. Watten said he spent two and a half months waiting.

“After three voicemails left with no return call, I started to panic, concerned that I had become the victim of a Ponzi scheme,” he said.

A few weeks later, he did get a call, Mr. Watten said, though it was from someone at MNFA who was unaware of his previous calls and who tried to sell him more leads.

“I also likely would have given them more time to deliver if it wasn't for the fact that they pushed a new contract out to us with language that would not guarantee a full refund upon request,” he said.

Ultimately, he got a full refund and walked away.

Founder Frank Troise doesn't dispute that account but said Mr. Watten's frustration coincided with a major retooling of MNFA and a campaign to contact all customers.

The change in verbiage to “best efforts,” from “guaranteed” leads, stemmed from the service's popularity in locations such as the Los Angeles area, where Mr. Watten's firm is located, Mr. Troise said.

The original process — first-come, first-served blocks of leads going to the geographically closest firms — had not worked, so MNFA replaced it with a more granular filtering methodology dictated by the adviser and investor when signing up for the service, he said.

The MNFA model also had a tough time handling the size differences of registered investment adviser firms. Large RIAs want a strong, steady stream of geographically adjacent leads, while smaller firms need a trickle spread over a longer time, Mr. Troise said.

Another problem, which only time has revealed, is the need for speed.

“One of the challenges we have is that smaller RIAs can go two to three days to call back a lead we generate, but if an adviser does not call back in 30 minutes, they are going to lose that lead,” Mr. Troise said.

The InvestmentNews/Moss Adams Financial Performance Study of Advisory Firms lends credence to this argument: It found that 67% of new clients and new revenue come from either a client or center of influence referral, as opposed to a lead generation system like MNFA's.

Another adviser, provided by MNFA, said he is having success with the model, however.

“In the first two months, we got probably 100 leads, and from there we have identified several million dollars in assets, of which we probably have closed $10 million,” said Joseph D. Anderson, executive vice president of Pure Financial Advisors Inc., an RIA firm with $600 million in assets under management.

Visit Monday's blog post for additional information

djanowski@investmentnews.com Twitter: @ddjanowski

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Oct 17

Conference

Best Practices Workshop

For the fifth year, InvestmentNews will host the Best Practices Workshop & Awards, bringing together the industry’s top-performing and most influential firms in one room for a full-day. This exclusive workshop and awards program for the... Learn more

Latest news & opinion

DOL Fiduciary Rule: What you need to know about Acosta's decision

Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta confirmed that the agency's fiduciary rule will become applicable on June 9. Find out what advisers and firms should know when it goes into effect.

Acosta declines to extend delay of DOL fiduciary rule

Labor Secretary finds no legal basis to delay implementation; rule to become applicable June 9

Phyllis Borzi says opponents of DOL fiduciary rule face uphill climb to further delay or dilute it

Former assistant Labor secretary who crafted the rule says President Trump won't be able to get rid of it simply because he doesn't like it.

Advisers go on the offensive, getting clients ready for the next market correction

Some proactive planners are spelling out for clients the impact of a 10% or 20% correction.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print