Mary Beth Franklin

Retirement 2.0blog

Mary Beth Franklin on what your clients really want when they talk about retirement.

Mary Beth Franklin: Get your (Social Security) tricks on Route 66

That's the magic number for maxing spousal benefits

Nov 5, 2012 @ 10:02 am

By Mary Beth Franklin

Social Security
+ Zoom
Don't jettison those bennies

When it comes to maximizing Social Security benefits, married couples have the most flexibility. But the rules about how and when to claim those benefits are very confusing, as evidenced by the numerous questions that have been clogging my inbox.

Financial advisers and their clients and intrigued by the idea that one spouse may be able to claim a reduced retirement benefit early while the other spouse delays claiming benefits until they are worth more later, maximizing their joint lifetime benefits.

In between the extremes of collecting reduced benefits at the earliest age of 62 and maximum benefits at 70, there's room for a little magic in between.

But to engage in the more sophisticated strategies, such as filing a restricted claim for spousal benefits only or filing and suspending benefits, at least one spouse must wait until his or her normal retirement age of 66 to take action. That's why, when I'm traveling around the country addressing financial adviser conferences or speaking to consumer audiences, I like to call 66 “the magic age”.

I have been amazed and gratified by the growing interest in this topic. And apparently I'm not alone. As one adviser from Denver recently wrote, “In 35 years of practice, the issue of Social Security claiming strategies has only come up about a half-a-dozen times. But in the past month, it's come up three times.”

The adviser said he recently met two potential new clients, a couple of medical doctors married to one another, both 65 years old. He asked: “Can they each apply for benefits on the other spouse (so they are both collecting half of each other's benefit now) and then at age 70 switch to their deferred individual benefits that would have been growing at 8% per year?”

I replied: No and yes.

No, they can't both claim spousal benefits. One spouse must take action to trigger benefits in order for the other spouse to claim them. But yes, there is a strategy that allows one of them to claim some Social Security benefits at 66 and for both of them to claim the maximum amount at 70.

Here's how it works. At 66, one spouse should file and suspend, triggering spousal benefits for the other and delaying his/her own retirement benefit until 70. Then, the other spouse, at 66, should file a restricted claim for spousal benefits only and delay collecting retirement benefits until 70. The couple will end up collecting one spousal benefit at 66 and two maximum retirement benefits at age 70.

Let me give you an example of how the numbers work. Say both spouses are entitled to $2,000 per month at their normal retirement age of 66. When the husband turns 66, he can file and suspend his retirement benefit, triggering a $1,000-per-month spousal benefit for his wife. At 66, the wife can file a restricted claim for spousal benefits only, collecting the $1,000-per-month spousal benefit rather than her full $2,000 retirement benefit.

Because they have both deferred their own retirement benefits, each will continue to accrue delayed retirement credits worth 8% per year between their normal retirement age of 66 and age 70. In this case, each of the $2,000-per-month retirement benefits at normal retirement age will increase to $2,640 per month by age 70. At that point, they each would switch to collect their enhanced benefits

In the above example, their combined Social Security benefits would total $5,280 per month at age 70. That's more than $63,000 per year in guaranteed income for life and their larger base amount would translate into larger cost-of-living adjustments in the future.

In another case, an adviser from San Diego, said he is working with a couple where the husband, age 64, is fully retired, and the wife, 57, is still working. He wrote: “Is it possible for the husband to receive spousal benefits—half of his wife's benefit amount—now and allow his own benefit to continue to grow until age 70?

I replied: No. If the husband claims Social Security benefits now--- before he reaches his normal retirement age of 66-- he cannot segregate his benefit. He must collect the largest benefit to which he is entitled, which would be his own. But more importantly, because the wife is only 57 years old, she is not yet eligible for Social Security benefits. Consequently, there are no spousal benefits available for the husband to collect.

Remember my mantra: 66 is the magic age!

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Jun 27

Webcast

Emerging Market Debt: 5 Forces at Work

When it comes to emerging market debt, there are a series of forces that help you drive better results for your clients. In today's continually changing market environment, it is critical to know the forces at play to help keep your investment... Learn more

Accepted for 1 CE Credit from the CFP Board. Approved by IMCA for 1 CIMA®/CIMC®/CPWA® CE credit. Approved for 1 CFA Credit.

Featured video

Events

Pershing's Cirrotti: What's next for the fiduciary rule?

The Department of Labor's new fiduciary rule will have a lasting impact on this industry. Have we finally reached the finish line? Pershing's Rob Cirrotti explains what is to come.

Video Spotlight

Will It Last As Long As Your Clients Do?

Sponsored by Prudential

Video Spotlight

The Catalyst

Sponsored by Pershing

Latest news & opinion

Brian Block's $4 million bonus was tied to a key metric at ARCP

Prosecution rests case in fraud trial against CFO of American Realty Capital Properties.

Edward Jones is winning the Google search war

Brokerage firm's digital marketing investment helps land it at the top of local and overall search engine results, report finds.

Voya's win in 401(k) fee suit involving Financial Engines bodes well for other record keepers

Fidelity, Aon Hewitt and Xerox HR Solutions are currently defending against similar fiduciary-breach claims.

Collective investment trusts getting more attention from 401(k) advisers

The funds are catching on due largely to lower costs and more product availability, but come with some inherent drawbacks.

Vanguard rides robo-advice wave to $65B in assets

Personal Advisor Services, four times the size of its closest competitor, combines digital and human touch.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print