Updated Pru report out on Social Security strategies

Nov 25, 2012 @ 12:01 am

+ Zoom
(Getty Images)

There is nothing I enjoy more than sitting around with a bunch of smart people discussing my favorite topic: strategies for claiming Social Security.

I had a chance to do so last Monday with a stellar panel of experts at the Newseum in Washington.

The event unveiled an updated report from Prudential Financial Inc. outlining the options and strategies individuals can use to maximize lifetime Social Security income. In the 2012 version, author James Mahaney, vice president of strategic initiatives at Prudential, focuses on important claiming strategies for divorced and widowed people, and pulls back the curtain on the perplexing ways Social Security benefits are taxed.

I have enormous respect for his work. In fact, it was Mr. Mahaney's research that sparked my interest in Social Security-claiming strategies several years ago.

What is the biggest fear of today's retirees? Running out of money.

What can Social Security offer? Guaranteed income for life that increases over time.

It seems like a match made in heaven. Yet 70% of retirees continue to claim Social Security benefits before their full retirement age, even though their benefits will be reduced for life.

Claiming reduced benefits early is just one of the four biggest mistakes that many retirees make regarding Social Security. The others are underestimating the real value of Social Security, not understanding the ways married couples can integrate benefits, and getting blindsided by the tax torpedo as it applies to benefits.

I will be writing about these issues in coming weeks, but I want to give our readers a heads-up about this terrific report and companion video on the Prudential home page (prudential.com).

If financial advisers do nothing else, they should watch the brief video and tell their clients about it. It will go a long way toward educating them about the true value of Social Security benefits as part of a coordinated retirement income strategy.

As Mr. Mahaney wrote in his paper: “No other vehicle can match the combination of inflation-fighting increases, longevity protection, investment risk elimination and spousal coverage as Social Security can, potentially making it one of the most valuable sources of retirement income.”

Advisers who educate themselves about this important resource will go a long way toward winning the loyalty of their existing and potential clients. And when clients are more confident about their guaranteed sources of retirement income, they may be more inclined to invest the rest of their assets with their advisers.

mbfranklin@investmentnews.com Twitter: @mbfretirepro

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

INTV

State Street's Brie Williams: How financial advisers can protect clients with cognitive decline

Advisers need to take note of changes in their clients’ behaviors as they age, and help protect them from unnecessary financial fraud or loss, according to Brie Williams, head of practice management at State Street Global Advisors.

Latest news & opinion

House panel passes bill to replace DOL fiduciary rule with one requiring disclosure of conflicts

Measure likely to continue in partisan advance in House, but could stall in Senate.

Morgan Stanley says recruiting and attrition have slowed down

If wirehouses can successfully reduce their reliance on signing bonuses to recruit brokers, they could increase profits.

Managed accounts look attractive to 401(k) advisers, but how do you measure performance?

The customization that makes them a good investment option presents a benchmarking challenge.

National Holdings' acquisition of broker-dealer WFG Investments and its 200 advisers called off

Under an alternative plan, WFG's advisers will be relocated to three broker-dealers, including one owned by National Holdings.

House committees ready two assaults on DOL fiduciary rule this week

One is a vote on a bill to kill Labor's rule and replace it with a disclosure-based best-interest standard, while the second is legislation to prevent funding for enforcement of the regulation.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print