Sens.: Protect retirement plans

Dec 16, 2012 @ 12:01 am

By Darla Mercado

Retirement industry groups are rallying around a proposal championed by Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., and Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., to protect the tax incentives of saving in retirement plans.

This so-called sense of the Congress resolution stresses that not only do tax incentives for saving in plans play a major role in encouraging plan sponsors to maintain the plans and pushing participants to contribute, but they also increase the number of people who are covered by a retirement plan.

As the attention turns to reducing the deficit and cutting tax expenditures, retirement plans once again have come under scrutiny. A proposal in 2010 by Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles, co-chairmen of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, tackled expenditures tied to retirement savings, capping tax-preferred contributions to the lower of $20,000 or 20% of income.

Mr. Blumenthal and Mr. Isakson said that $4.7 trillion is held in 401(k), 403(b), 457 and other defined-contribution plans, while another $2.3 trillion is in private defined-benefit plans. Individual retirement accounts hold nearly $5 trillion, with much of that amount coming from rollovers from workplace retirement plans.

The accounts have been a boon for lower- to middle-income earners, as more than 70% of workers making between $30,000 and $50,000 annually are contributing to their own retirement when they have a savings plan at work, according to the proposal. Three years ago, 79% of federal tax incentives for DC plans were attributable to taxpayers with less than $150,000 in adjusted gross income.

REFORMED TAX CODE

Mr. Blumenthal and Mr. Isakson said that a reformed and simplified tax code must include tax incentives to maintain these plans.

Mr. Blumenthal represents Connecticut, which is home to a number of large insurance companies. Some of them offer market retirement savings vehicles or provide offerings to 401(k) plans.

Senators backing the resolution as co-sponsors include Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., John Boozman, R-Ark., Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, Ben Cardin, D-Md., Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, Kay Hagan, D-N.C., Rob Portman, R-Ohio, and Jon Tester, D-Mont.

A collective of retirement industry groups, dubbed The Coalition to Protect Retirement, supports the proposal. It comprises nine organizations, including the American Council of Life Insurers, the American Society of Pension Professionals and Actuaries, and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association.

The concern from the groups is centered largely on reducing the contribution limits into these savings plans, said Ed Ferrigno, vice president at the Plan Sponsor Council of America, a member of the coalition.

The impact is felt especially by smaller employers and their workers.

“It's not like small-business owners are putting money into the plan to benefit themselves. They're paying for the match and a share of the administrative cost,” Mr. Ferrigno said.

“If they are discouraged, we know absolutely there will be fewer plans and people saving for retirement,” he said.

dmercado@investmentnews.com Twitter: @darla_mercado

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Events

Why integration is essential (and how it works)

Integration has been one of the biggest fintech themes in 2017. But why (and how) does this work? Matt Brown of CAIS and Sean Mullen of Advice Period explain.

Video Spotlight

Help Clients Be Prepared, Not Surprised

Sponsored by Prudential

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

RIAs struggle to keep clients grounded amid stock market euphoria

With equities at record levels, financial advisers are confronted with realities of greed and fear.

Regulators showing renewed interest in cracking down on investment fees

SEC, Finra targeting high-fee share classes, 12b-1 fees and failure to give sales load discounts and waivers to investors.

Complexity of new indexed annuities causing concern

Insurers are using 'hybrid' indices as a way to differentiate themselves, but critics contend the products are less transparent, more confusing and don't add financial benefit.

Critics say regulation hasn't curbed overly rosy projections for indexed universal life insurance

They say rule didn't go far enough and more stringent measures may be necessary.

Broker, retirement groups make last-minute pleas to change tax legislation

Pass-through provisions are target of groups representing employee-model brokerage firms, as well as retirement plan advisers.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print