Senate cliff talks hit rocky patch

Republican McConnell senses lack of urgency; Reid says to 'hang loose'

Dec 30, 2012 @ 4:02 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

Last-ditch efforts in the Senate to reach an agreement to avert the so-called fiscal cliff appeared to reach an impasse on Sunday as senators were sent home for the evening.

Just before 6 p.m. in Washington, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said that the Senate would recess until 11 a.m. on Monday. Weekend talks aimed at preventing the approximately $600 billion in tax increases and spending cuts so far have not produced a proposal that can gain bipartisan support.

Senate Democrats and Republicans met in party caucuses from 3 p.m. until about 6 p.m. No lawmaker emerging from those meetings gave a definitive account of the latest offer from Republicans or any kind of counteroffer from Democrats. Neither Mr. Reid nor Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., provided an assessment of the talks before the Senate went into recess.

In a speech on the Senate floor in the middle of the afternoon, Mr. McConnell said that the GOP had submitted an offer last night around 7 p.m. and hadn't yet received a response from Democrats as of 2 p.m.

“I'm concerned with the lack of urgency here,” Mr. McConnell said. “There's far too much at stake for political gamesmanship. In order to get things moving, I have just spoken with Sen. Reid. I also placed a call to the vice president to see if he could help jump start the negotiations on their side.”

Just after Mr. McConnell spoke, Mr. Reid made a statement on the Senate floor, saying that the Democrats were not in a position at that time to make a counter offer. One possible sticking point is a provision that would change the way inflation is calculated for entitlement benefits.

“I'm not overly optimistic, but I'm cautiously optimistic we can get something,” Mr. Reid said.

He told his colleagues to standby for the rest of the day – and perhaps into the evening – for potential votes on a package that would address the approximately $600 billion in tax increases and spending cuts set to go into effect on Jan. 1.

“Everybody should hang loose,” Mr. Reid said. “Something may break and we may be able to get something done.”

Earlier in the day, President Barack Obama added to the political tension by saying in an interview on NBC's “Meet the Press” that Republicans' “only priority is that tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans are protected.”

That rhetoric drew a sharp response from House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio.

“Americans elected President Obama to lead, not cast blame,” Mr. Boehner said in a statement. “The president's comments today are ironic, as a recurring theme of our negotiations was his unwillingness to agree to anything that would require him to stand up to his own party. Needed cuts and reforms that the president agreed to just last year were no longer on the table, as he cited an inability to sell them to Democrats.”

The House came back into session on Sunday and is awaiting a fiscal-cliff bill from the Senate.

If an agreement is reached, final votes may not occur until late on Monday.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


Celebrity adviser David Bach: Here's what every adviser should be talking about with clients right now

New York Times best-selling author David Bach says every financial adviser should be talking to clients about how they are going to weather a market downturn.

Video Spotlight

Help Clients Be Prepared, Not Surprised

Sponsored by Prudential

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

RIAs struggle to keep clients grounded amid stock market euphoria

With equities at record levels, financial advisers are confronted with realities of greed and fear.

Regulators showing renewed interest in cracking down on investment fees

SEC, Finra targeting high-fee share classes, 12b-1 fees and failure to give sales load discounts and waivers to investors.

Tax update: Brady says sales tax deduction in final bill

Taxpayers will be able to deduct state income taxes or state sales taxes in addition to property levies — up to a $10,000 cap.

Complexity of new indexed annuities causing concern

Insurers are using 'hybrid' indices as a way to differentiate themselves, but critics contend the products are less transparent, more confusing and don't add financial benefit.

Critics say regulation hasn't curbed overly rosy projections for indexed universal life insurance

They say rule didn't go far enough and more stringent measures may be necessary.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print