InvestmentNews INsider

The INsiderblog

InvestmentNews reporters offer their take on intriguing or controversial articles from around the web.

Why didn't the GOP take any bows for the budget deal?

By harping on the negatives of the deal, Republicans failed to get credit for protecting most of their constituents

Jan 7, 2013 @ 2:03 pm

By Robert Hordt

The fiscal cliff negotiations are going down as a major setback for congressional Republicans — President Barack Obama got his tax increase on the rich and the GOP got no spending cuts — but it seems to me the Republicans could have come off a lot better.

Rather than whining about the Obama administration's not tackling entitlement funding — and warning about the tough battle ahead over the debt ceiling and budget deficits — Republican lawmakers should have been taking some of the credit for the positive elements of the fiscal cliff legislation.

And make no mistake, there are a lot of good things for GOP's core constituency in the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012.

Let's start with marginal tax rates. The fact that the threshold on higher income tax rates was moved from $200,000 to $400,000 (and from $250,000 to $450,000 for couples) was a victory for many of the upper-middle income people Republicans traditionally speak for.

GOP legislators could have also taken credit for minimizing the impact of taxes on dividends. Many observers expected dividends to be taxed at the same rate as ordinary income, but that proved not to be the case. Capping the rate at 15% for most taxpayers, and at no more than 20% for wealthy taxpayers, was one of the true achievements of the tax bill.

And how about estate taxes? Sure, the tax rate on estates jumps to 40% from 35%. But that's a win when you consider that the rate was due to go to 55%, and the exemption was set to drop back to $1 million, from $5 million.

Don't forget the AMT. Had nothing been done, the dreaded alternative minimum tax would have ensnared another 30 million or so middle-income and upper-income taxpayers in its clutches for 2012. Not only does the new law boost the level of exemption, it indexes future exemption levels to inflation, something that critics have been advocating for years.

The bottom line is that the GOP could have — and should have — grabbed its fair share of credit for averting the fiscal cliff and cutting the best deal it could, given Republican lawmakers were negotiating with a president who had just been re-elected. Instead of accentuating what was done, the Republican leadership decided to harp on what was not done, leaving taxpayers and voters with the sense that all of Washington had indeed let them down again.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video

INTV

Why some retirement plan advisers think Fidelity is invading their turf

InvestmentNews editor Frederick P. Gabriel Jr. and reporter Greg Iacurci talk about this week's cover story that looks at whether Fidelity Investments is stepping on the toes of retirement plan advisers.

Latest news & opinion

Broker protocol: Indecision over recruiting agreement is rampant

Ruckus over recruiting agreement has even wirehouse lifers wondering if it's time

Cetera reportedly exploring $1.5 billion sale

The company confirmed it's talking to investment bankers to 'explore how to best optimize [its] capital structure at lower costs.'

SEC Chairman Jay Clayton outlines goals for a new fiduciary standard

Rule should provide clarity on role of adviser, enhanced investor protection and regulatory coordination.

Advisers bemoan LPL's technology platform change

Those in a private LinkedIn chat room were sounding off about fears the independent broker-dealer will require a move to ClientWorks before it is fully ready.

Speculation mounts on whether others will follow UBS' latest move to prevent brokers from leaving

UBS brokers must sign a 12-month non-solicit agreement if they want their 2017 bonuses.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print