Finra seeks to tighten arbitrator rule

Regulator's proposal would exclude mutual fund, hedge fund people from pool of public panelists

Jan 14, 2013 @ 3:39 pm

By Dan Jamieson

finra, arbitration, regulator, regulation, SEC
+ Zoom

Finra is proposing to tighten up on its definition of “public” arbitrator.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. wants to exclude people associated with a mutual fund or hedge fund from its pool of public arbitrators and require certain others to wait for two years after ending an industry affiliation before being classified as a public arbitrator.

In a filing posted Friday on the Securities and Exchange Commission's website, Finra said the change “would improve investors' perception about the fairness and neutrality of Finra's public arbitrator roster.”

Under its proposal, Finra would implement a two-year cooling-off period for attorneys, accountants and others who have done a certain amount of work for securities industry clients, and for those who work for or serve as officers or directors of entities controlled by securities firms. The two-year wait also would cover spouses and immediate family members of such individuals.

“In one instance, an individual applying to be a public arbitrator had retired one month earlier from a lengthy career at a law firm that represented securities industry clients,” Finra said in its filing.

Finra already has a five-year waiting period for former securities industry employees wishing to serve as public arbitrators, and bans those associated with the industry for at least 20 years from ever becoming public arbitrators.

The latest proposal is another step in a long-running effort by Finra to tighten up on who is considered a public panelist.

Still, claimants' attorneys say Finra needs to go further and eliminate anyone who has had any connection with the industry.

Finra's proposal is “a step in right direction, but … there's a lot more ground to cover,” said Scott Ilgenfritz, a partner with Johnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns LLP and president of the Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association, which represents plaintiff's attorneys.

The two-year cooling-off period is a “noble” idea, said Hugh Berkson, a plaintiff's attorney and partner at Hermann Cahn & Schneider LLP.

He noted, however, that an industry defense attorney can be classified as a public panelist after a two-year wait.

“I just don't think you walk away from the defense-lawyer mindset in two years,” he said.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Consuelo Mack WealthTrack

T. Rowe Price's Brian Rogers: Are there companies you can buy and hold forever?

Brian Rogers, non-executive chairman at T. Rowe Price, says there are just several companies that he stayed invested in throughout his 30-year term at the helm of the equity income fund.

Latest news & opinion

DOL fiduciary rule causing DC-plan record keepers to change business with insurance agents

Principal has communicated that independent agents must change their business models to keep receiving compensation.

DOL fiduciary rule opponents want to push implementation back until 2019

ICI, Chamber of Commerce among groups asking for delay, while Democratic lawmakers call on DOL to keep to its earlier planned schedule of Jan. 1, 2018.

Take 5: Vanguard's new CIO Greg Davis talks bonds, stocks and costs

Having just stepped into the role, this veteran of the firm now oversees $3.8 trillion in assets in more than 300 mutual funds and exchange-traded funds.

Tech companies deploy behavioral finance tools for advisers

They seek to turn knowing more about clients into growing more revenue.

Retirement planning for women

Longer lifespans and lower savings require creative income strategies.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print