Finra backtracks on plan to end 5% markup rule

Commenters had warned against eliminating it without setting a new standard

Feb 10, 2013 @ 12:01 am

By Dan Jamieson

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. is backtracking on a controversial plan to end its 5% markup rule.

In a regulatory notice posted Jan. 31 on its website, Finra asked for comment on an updated proposal that would keep the 5% guideline in place. The guideline says that in most transactions, markups of 5% or less fall within the “fair and reasonable” standard.

The action follows complaints about its proposal to eliminate the 5% rule for markups and markdowns.

“A majority of the comments received on the initial proposal opposed the elimination of the 5% policy,” Finra said in the notice. “These commenters stated that the 5% policy generally has been effective in regulating broker-dealers for over 70 years, and eliminating it would reduce investor protection.”

INITIAL PROPOSAL

In its initial proposal — floated nearly two years ago — Finra promised updated guidance to replace the 5% threshold, but commenters warned against eliminating it without setting a new standard.

Nevertheless, industry attorneys don't like the old 5% limit, which dates from 1943.

“You know [Finra is] not going to [use] 5%, because we've seen enough settlements at 3% [markups] where Finra has found them to be excessive,” said Elizabeth Baird, a partner at Bingham McCutchen LLP and a former bond trader. “It really is sending a bad message to member firms” that a 5% markup or markdown is generally OK, she said.

Finra examiners actually use something closer to a 2% to 3% markup, observers said, and Finra has said that the 5% rule is a guideline only.

“It's like charades; you don't know what they're looking for,” Ms. Baird said.

“As a compliance officer, you spend time talking to the trading desk ... "You should be thinking a 2% [threshold], because examiners are honing in on that,'” said David Rosedahl, an attorney at Briggs and Morgan PA.

Finra spokeswoman Michelle Ong declined to comment.

"PROCEEDS' RULE

In its most recent notice, Finra said it also wanted to do away with a “proceeds” rule that applies the markup guidance to round-trip transactions, as well as a proposed requirement that firms provide equity commission rate schedules to retail customers.

Finra wants comments on the new proposal by April 1.

The changes, part of Finra's continuing rule consolidation process, would be part of the regulator's new Rule 2121, which, like predecessor rules, will require that securities transactions be done at fair prices.

djamieson@investmentnews.com Twitter: @dvjamieson

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

INTV

Why some retirement plan advisers think Fidelity is invading their turf

InvestmentNews editor Frederick P. Gabriel Jr. and reporter Greg Iacurci talk about this week's cover story that looks at whether Fidelity Investments is stepping on the toes of retirement plan advisers.

Latest news & opinion

Broker protocol: Indecision over recruiting agreement is rampant

Ruckus over recruiting agreement has even wirehouse lifers wondering if it's time

Cetera reportedly exploring $1.5 billion sale

The company confirmed it's talking to investment bankers to 'explore how to best optimize [its] capital structure at lower costs.'

SEC Chairman Jay Clayton outlines goals for a new fiduciary standard

Rule should provide clarity on role of adviser, enhanced investor protection and regulatory coordination.

Advisers bemoan LPL's technology platform change

Those in a private LinkedIn chat room were sounding off about fears the independent broker-dealer will require a move to ClientWorks before it is fully ready.

Speculation mounts on whether others will follow UBS' latest move to prevent brokers from leaving

UBS brokers must sign a 12-month non-solicit agreement if they want their 2017 bonuses.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print