Subscribe

Mass. regulator: Ban pre-dispute arb pacts

Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin urges SEC to consider banning the use of such agreements by registered investment advisers

Massachusetts’ top securities regulator is concerned about RIAs using pre-dispute arbitration agreements with clients.

In a letter sent last week to the Securities and Exchange Commission, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin urged the agency to consider banning the use of such agreements by registered investment advisers.

“At a minimum, the commission should commence a study of the issues raised by these provisions,” he wrote. “It is my opinion that they are inconsistent with the fiduciary duty that investment advisers owe to their clients.”

DETRIMENT OF CLIENTS

In an interview, Mr. Galvin said he is worried that advisers may be using pre-dispute arbitration agreements to the detriment of their clients.

His concern is based on an adviser survey conducted last month by the Massachusetts Securities Division. The state found that 45.5% of 323 responding firms use pre-dispute agreements, and of those, 65% designate a particular arbitrator or forum.

Of this latter group, 60% designate the American Arbitration Association as the forum, and 15% the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc.

Most broker-dealers have long required pre-dispute agreements with customers.

Mr. Galvin said that there is a distinction between brokers and advisers.

“There tends to be a very personal relationship between an investment adviser and clients, and the facts [in a dispute] are very important,” tending to “turn on statements made,” he said. “So an investor shouldn’t be precluded from court.”

In an e-mail, SEC spokes-man John Nester wrote: “We look forward to receiving the letter and hearing [Mr. Galvin’s] views.”

In November, Finra opened up its arbitration system to RIAs and their clients, but only if both parties signed an agreement to arbitrate after a dispute arose.

Any pre-dispute agreements RIAs use have “no relevance to the Finra forum,” a spokeswoman for the regulator, Michelle Ong, wrote in an e-mail.

[email protected] Twitter: @dvjamieson

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Turning advice on its head

United Capital's Joe Duran is hellbent on changing the industry.

Florida advisers sue CFP Board

Husband and wife balk over a disciplinary case the board raised for using the term “fee-only” to describe their compensation.

BofA Merrill agrees to $39M gender discrimination settlement

Lawsuit alleged a "deep rooted and pervasive gender discrimination" existed at Bank of America and Merrill Lynch

Supremes give Schwab a boost over Finra in arbitration scuffle

A recent Supreme Court decision allowing class action waivers tips the scales in favor of Charles Schwab in its scuffle with Finra over the tactic.

DeWaay settles with Finra over sales practices

Pays fine, accepts suspension but B-D already closed, securities license dropped.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print