Mass. regulator: Ban pre-dispute arb pacts

Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin urges SEC to consider banning the use of such agreements by registered investment advisers

Feb 17, 2013 @ 12:01 am

By Dan Jamieson

Massachusetts' top securities regulator is concerned about RIAs using pre-dispute arbitration agreements with clients.

In a letter sent last week to the Securities and Exchange Commission, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin urged the agency to consider banning the use of such agreements by registered investment advisers.

“At a minimum, the commission should commence a study of the issues raised by these provisions,” he wrote. “It is my opinion that they are inconsistent with the fiduciary duty that investment advisers owe to their clients.”


In an interview, Mr. Galvin said he is worried that advisers may be using pre-dispute arbitration agreements to the detriment of their clients.

His concern is based on an adviser survey conducted last month by the Massachusetts Securities Division. The state found that 45.5% of 323 responding firms use pre-dispute agreements, and of those, 65% designate a particular arbitrator or forum.

Of this latter group, 60% designate the American Arbitration Association as the forum, and 15% the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc.

Most broker-dealers have long required pre-dispute agreements with customers.

Mr. Galvin said that there is a distinction between brokers and advisers.

“There tends to be a very personal relationship between an investment adviser and clients, and the facts [in a dispute] are very important,” tending to “turn on statements made,” he said. “So an investor shouldn't be precluded from court.”

In an e-mail, SEC spokes-man John Nester wrote: “We look forward to receiving the letter and hearing [Mr. Galvin's] views.”

In November, Finra opened up its arbitration system to RIAs and their clients, but only if both parties signed an agreement to arbitrate after a dispute arose.

Any pre-dispute agreements RIAs use have “no relevance to the Finra forum,” a spokeswoman for the regulator, Michelle Ong, wrote in an e-mail. Twitter: @dvjamieson


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video


Top questions surrounding future of DOL fiduciary rule

Reporter Greg Iacurci and managing editor Christina Nelson discuss the biggest uncertainties springing from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision to vacate the regulation.

Latest news & opinion

SEC forging ahead on fiduciary rule despite DOL rule decision in 5th Circuit

Chairman Jay Clayton says 'the sooner the better' when asked when an SEC fiduciary rule will be ready.

What the next market downturn means for small RIAs

Firms that have enjoyed AUM growth because of the runup in stocks may find it hard to adjust to declining revenues if the market suffers a major correction.

DOL fiduciary rule likely to live on despite appeals court loss

Future developments will hinge on whether the Labor Department continues the fight to remake the regulation its own way.

DOL fiduciary rule: Industry reacts to Fifth Circuit ruling

Groups on both sides of the fiduciary debate had plenty to say.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacates DOL fiduciary rule

In split decision, judges say agency exceeded authority.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print