Mass. regulator: Ban pre-dispute arb pacts

Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin urges SEC to consider banning the use of such agreements by registered investment advisers

Feb 17, 2013 @ 12:01 am

By Dan Jamieson

+ Zoom
(Thinkstock)

Massachusetts' top securities regulator is concerned about RIAs using pre-dispute arbitration agreements with clients.

In a letter sent last week to the Securities and Exchange Commission, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin urged the agency to consider banning the use of such agreements by registered investment advisers.

“At a minimum, the commission should commence a study of the issues raised by these provisions,” he wrote. “It is my opinion that they are inconsistent with the fiduciary duty that investment advisers owe to their clients.”

DETRIMENT OF CLIENTS

In an interview, Mr. Galvin said he is worried that advisers may be using pre-dispute arbitration agreements to the detriment of their clients.

His concern is based on an adviser survey conducted last month by the Massachusetts Securities Division. The state found that 45.5% of 323 responding firms use pre-dispute agreements, and of those, 65% designate a particular arbitrator or forum.

Of this latter group, 60% designate the American Arbitration Association as the forum, and 15% the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc.

Most broker-dealers have long required pre-dispute agreements with customers.

Mr. Galvin said that there is a distinction between brokers and advisers.

“There tends to be a very personal relationship between an investment adviser and clients, and the facts [in a dispute] are very important,” tending to “turn on statements made,” he said. “So an investor shouldn't be precluded from court.”

In an e-mail, SEC spokes-man John Nester wrote: “We look forward to receiving the letter and hearing [Mr. Galvin's] views.”

In November, Finra opened up its arbitration system to RIAs and their clients, but only if both parties signed an agreement to arbitrate after a dispute arose.

Any pre-dispute agreements RIAs use have “no relevance to the Finra forum,” a spokeswoman for the regulator, Michelle Ong, wrote in an e-mail.

djamieson@investmentnews.com Twitter: @dvjamieson

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Events

Albridge's Butler: Making advisers of tomorrow more effective and efficient

Gadget Girl checks out the latest tech from Albridge and how they're helping advisers stay one step ahead of the curve.

Video Spotlight

Will It Last As Long As Your Clients Do?

Sponsored by Prudential

Video Spotlight

The Catalyst

Sponsored by Pershing

Latest news & opinion

Brian Block's $4 million bonus was tied to a key metric at ARCP

Prosecution rests case in fraud trial against CFO of American Realty Capital Properties.

Edward Jones is winning the Google search war

Brokerage firm's digital marketing investment helps land it at the top of local and overall search engine results, report finds.

Voya's win in 401(k) fee suit involving Financial Engines bodes well for other record keepers

Fidelity, Aon Hewitt and Xerox HR Solutions are currently defending against similar fiduciary-breach claims.

Collective investment trusts getting more attention from 401(k) advisers

The funds are catching on due largely to lower costs and more product availability, but come with some inherent drawbacks.

Vanguard rides robo-advice wave to $65B in assets

Personal Advisor Services, four times the size of its closest competitor, combines digital and human touch.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print