Schwab wins 'huge' ruling on class-action waivers

Decision by Finra panel could see scores of other brokerages employ arbitration agreements with clients

Feb 21, 2013 @ 7:04 pm

By Dan Jamieson

Finra, Charles Schwab, arbitration
+ Zoom
((Photo: Bloomberg News))

In a potentially far-reaching decision, a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. hearing panel has dismissed two of three counts Finra brought against the Charles Schwab Corp. a year ago in a case involving Schwab's pre-dispute arbitration agreements.

The panel concluded that the “language used in Schwab's customer agreements to prohibit participation in judicial class actions does violate Finra rules, but that Finra may not enforce those rules because they are in conflict with the Federal Arbitration Act,” Finra said in a statement Thursday.

The hearing panel's interpretation of the Federal Arbitration Act opens the door for every brokerage firm to use arbitration agreements like Schwab's and keep customers from participating in class-action cases, said Joel Beck, founder of The Beck Law Firm LLC and a former Finra attorney.

“The potential consequences are huge, because every broker-dealer would like to insulate themselves,” he said.

In a third cause of action, the panel found that Schwab violated Finra rules by attempting to limit the ability of arbitrators to consolidate individual claims in arbitration, the statement said.

For that last violation, the hearing panel fined Schwab $500,000, and ordered the firm to remove the offending language from is arbitration agreements and notify customers.

Either party can appeal to Finra's National Adjudicatory Council. The NAC on its own can also review the case. If no action is taken within 45 days, the decision becomes final.

Finra spokeswoman Nancy Condon said no decisions have been made about an appeal.

“Schwab is pleased with the panel's decision, which ruled in the company's favor on the central class action waiver issue,” said Schwab spokesman Greg Gable in an email.

Schwab feels arbitration is more effective for both the company and its customers, he added.

Because of the importance of the case, Mr. Beck noted that he'd “be surprised if it stands without further review."

Finra does not allow class-action claims to be filed in its arbitration system, so precluding customers from pursuing class claims in court effectively kills them.

Schwab added the disputed language to its agreements in 2011. Finra claimed the new agreements were then sent to almost 7 million Schwab customers.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Events

How to build a better business plan

Financial advisers are good at a lot of things, but business planning isn't always one of them. Why is that and how can they improve? Teri Shepherd of Carson Group offers some solutions.

Video Spotlight

The Search for Income

Sponsored by PGIM Investments

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

How does your advisory firm stack up?

Comparing a firm's pay to the competition can point out vast flaws.

10 signs your client is cheating on you

Sure signs that clients may be on the way out the door.

Morgan Stanley sees slower fee-based asset flows on fiduciary rule delay

Flows to advisory accounts, while still higher than the start of 2016, dropped off more than 20% from Q2 and were the lowest in a year.

How adviser salaries stack up to other jobs

Median compensation hovers just under $100,000 on the low end and reaches nearly $300,000 for bosses.

Finra ranking brokers in effort to crack down on industry's bad apples

All 634.403 reps have been ranked based on factors such as prior regulatory disclosures, disciplinary actions and employment history.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print