Take two for Finra on advance-notice rule

Plans to reissue a package of controversial membership rules regarding alerts on business changes

Feb 24, 2013 @ 12:01 am

By Dan Jamieson

+ Zoom
(Bloomberg)

Finra is planning to reissue a package of controversial membership rules regarding alerts on business changes.

In an e-mail sent to member firms Feb. 14, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. chief executive Richard G. Ketchum said the board had approved issuing a revised proposal in response to comments on the previous one, which was floated in 2010.

The original proposal drew a sharp response from the brokerage industry, which said Finra's plan to require 30 days' notice for changes in a number of routine business activities was too far-reaching.

Among other things, Finra wanted advance notice of new products or services; expansion of personnel beyond certain limits; transactions that involved 10% or more of a firm's ownership, assets or revenue; and changes in a member's service providers.

If the changes had been ap-proved, the advance notice would have allowed Finra to require a formal approval process — known as a continuing-member application — and object to any changes.

The proposal was designed to avoid fraud at both broker-dealers and their affiliates.

In his e-mail, Mr. Ketchum said the revised proposal would include provisions to address regulatory issues identified by Finra and to codify existing interpretations and practices.

Andrew DeSouza, a SIFMA spokesman, and Finra spokeswoman Michelle Ong declined to comment about Finra's plan to reissue the rule.

In a statement, FSI general counsel David Bellaire noted that Mr. Ketchum's e-mail did not specify what will be included in the new proposal.

“We are hopeful that Finra has addressed the issues we raised in our original comment letter,” he said.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

INTV

Ed Slott: The conversation advisers need to have with spousal IRA beneficiaries

Clients who inherit IRAs from their spouses need to decide whether to remain beneficiaries or do spousal rollovers. One important factor in that decision is their age, according to Ed Slott, founder of Ed Slott's Elite IRA Advisor Group.

Latest news & opinion

Will Jeffrey Gundlach's Trump-like approach on Twitter work in financial services?

The DoubleLine CEO's attacks on Wall Street Journal reporters is igniting a discussion on what's fair game on social media.

Plaintiffs win in Tibble vs. Edison 401(k) fee case

After a decade of activity around the lawsuit, including a hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court, judge rules a prudent fiduciary would have invested in institutional shares.

Advisers get more breathing room to make Form ADV changes

RIAs can enter '0' in some new parts of the document before their annual filing next year.

Since banking scandal, Wells Fargo advisers with more than $19.2 billion leave firm

Despite a trying year, the firm has said it will sweeten signing bonuses for veteran advisers.

Is LPL's deal sweet enough for NPH's 3,200 reps and advisers?

They will have to decide if the signing package they are being offered by LPL makes sense. A lot is hanging in the balance.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print