Retirement 2.0blog

Mary Beth Franklin: How to couple survivor and retirement benefits

Wife's terminal illness allows husband to plan for a future alone

Feb 28, 2013 @ 12:46 pm

By Mary Beth Franklin

I received a poignant e-mail from an adviser in Iowa this morning who had questions about when and how he should claim Social Security benefits after his wife, who has terminal cancer, passes away.

Bill is 62. His wife, who is 64, has been receiving Social Security disability benefits for three years. Although she has already outlived all of her doctors' life expectancy projections, there is no cure for colon cancer. “Each day with her is a blessing and we are having fun running down her bucket list,” he wrote.

Bill wants to know whether he can claim a “spousal benefit” after his wife dies. “And if I do claim benefits early, does it diminish what I can take at age 66?” he asked.

When one spouse dies, claiming a spousal benefit is no longer an option. But there would be a survivor benefit which is worth twice as much as a spousal benefit.

Widows or widowers benefits can claim survivor benefits as early as age 60, but they are reduced by a fraction of a percent for each month benefits are claimed before full retirement age. If a person receives survivor benefits, and will qualify for a retirement benefit that's more than their survivors benefit, he or she can switch to their own retirement benefit as early as age 62 or as late as age 70.

There's a major different between the two benefits: Retirement benefits accrue delayed retirement credits worth 8% per year between normal retirement age and age 70. Survivor benefits do not.

While a spousal benefit is worth up to half of the worker's benefit amount if claimed at normal retirement age a survivor benefit is worth 100% of what the worker was receiving, or was entitled to receive, at the time of his or her death. In either case, benefits are reduced if you claim them before your normal retirement age.

Plus, any type of Social Security benefits—whether retirement, spousal or survivor—claimed before normal retirement age are also subject to the earnings cap restrictions. In 2013, you lose $1 in benefits for every $2 you earn over $15,120. Essentially, that means if you earn about $45,000 or more this year, you would lose all of your Social Security benefits so it would be better to wait at least until your normal retirement age to claim benefits.

After his wife's death, Bill would be entitled to a monthly survivor benefit equal to what she received in disability benefits if he was 66 or older at the time he collected them. It he claimed survivor benefits before then, they would be reduced.

Bill may want to claim survivor benefits as soon as he is eligible. He is semi-retired so he says his earnings won't be affected by the earnings cap. Income from his private-sector pension and investment income won't affect his Social Security benefits either.

He can then maximize his own retirement benefits by postponing collecting them until he turns 70. They way they will accrue delayed retirement credits worth 8% per year for every year between his normal retirement age of 66 and 70. At that point, his benefit would be worth 32% more than at his full retirement age would create a bigger base benefit for future cost-of-living adjustments.

When deciding which benefit to claim first, you should compare the available survivor benefit, which will not increase, to the maximum retirement benefit, which could include delayed retirement credits.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

RIA Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' RIA Data Center to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

Featured video

INTV

Advisers beware: tax law has unintended consequences

Commission accounts could be preferable for some clients, and advisers could be incentivized to move from employee broker-dealers to independent channels.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Cutting through the red tape of adviser regulation is tricky

Don't expect a simple rollback of rules under the Trump administration in 2018 — instead, regulators are on pace to bolster financial adviser oversight.

Bond investors have more to worry about than a government shutdown

Inflation worries, international rates pushing Treasuries yields higher.

State measures to prevent elder financial abuse gaining steam

A growing number of states are looking to pass rules preventing exploitation of seniors.

Morgan Stanley reports a loss of advisers after exiting the protocol for broker recruiting

The firm said it lost 47 brokers in the fourth quarter, the most in any quarter of 2017.

Morgan Stanley's wealth management fees climb to all-time high

Improvement reflect firm's shift of more clients into fee-based accounts priced on asset levels, which boosts results as markets rise.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print