Congressional criminals still can collect public pensions

Former Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. is the latest member of Congress to fall from grace

Mar 3, 2013 @ 12:01 am

By

I find it mind-boggling that members of Congress who are convicted of crimes while in office are collecting, or will be eligible to collect, their taxpayer-funded government pensions.

Former Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. is the latest example of a member of Congress who was unable to obey the very laws he helped pass. The Illinois Democrat a few weeks ago pleaded guilty to one felony count in connection with using campaign contributions to buy $750,000 worth of luxury items and memorabilia.

During his plea agreement hearing, Mr. Jackson said: “For years, I lived off my campaign. I used money I shouldn't have used for personal purposes.”

Mr. Jackson added that he had “misled the American people.”

And yet Mr. Jackson, who will be sentenced June 28, technically is eligible to collect his estimated $45,000 annual pension when he turns 62 in 2028.

I say “technically” because there is a slight twist to this specific case.

In a published report, Kenneth Gross, a Washington attorney who specializes in campaign law compliance, said that because Mr. Jackson pleaded guilty, his pension may be in jeopardy because of a law that strips pensions for lawmakers convicted of an array of public- corruption crimes.

Pete Sepp, executive vice president of the National Taxpayers Union, agrees with Mr. Gross' assessment of the case involving Mr. Jackson.

For years, the only crimes that could deprive a lawmaker of his or her pension were “high crimes,” largely involving treason or espionage, Mr. Sepp said.

“The Jackson case is an interesting one, raising questions about interpretation of law regarding deprivation of pension,” he said.

New laws were enacted in September 2007 and April 2012 that widened the list of offenses that could deprive a lawmaker of a pension, Mr. Sepp said.

The problem, however, is in the interpretation.

For example, former three-term Rep. Rick Renzi, R-Ariz., was indicted in 2008 on charges that included extortion, wire fraud and money laundering.

Although his case has yet to come to trial, even if he is convicted, he won't lose his forthcoming federal pension, as his crimes are alleged to have occurred before enactment of the 2007 pension law.

Meanwhile, about 20 former members of Congress who were convicted of crimes while in office are collecting, or stand to receive, an annual taxpayer-funded government pension, according to the NTU.

HALL OF SHAME

If you are enjoying your breakfast or lunch while reading this, you may want to stop eating.

Veteran Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham, R-Calif., who was convicted and sentenced to prison in a bribery case, continues to collect a combined $64,000-a-year congressional and military pension.

Rep. James A. Traficant Jr., D-Ohio, was ousted from Congress after being convicted in 2002 of taking bribes, filing false tax returns and racketeering.

He was released from prison in 2009 and continues to receive his $40,000-a-year taxpayer-funded federal pension.

Rep. William Jefferson, D-La., convicted on federal charges of racketeering, soliciting bribes and money laundering, is serving 13 years in prison. He also continues to collect his $40,000-a-year taxpayer-funded federal pension.

In all, U.S. taxpayers shell out about $800,000 a year in pensions for convicted former congressmen, the NTU reports. Sure, that is small change in our multitrillion-dollar economy, but it is about more than the money.

These elected officials were convicted of violating the public's trust, and they should have no right to a retirement check that is being funded by the very people they betrayed.

It seems obvious, but Congress needs to find ways to further strengthen current laws by ending pensions for members of Congress convicted of crimes while in office.

American taxpayers should not foot the retirement bill for members of Congress who break the law and violate our trust.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Mar 13

Conference

WOMEN to WATCH

InvestmentNews is honoring female financial advisers and industry executives who are distinguished leaders at their firms. These women have advanced the business of providing advice through their passion, creativity, inclusive approach and... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

When can advisers expect an SEC fiduciary rule proposal and other regs this year?

Managing editor Christina Nelson and senior reporter Mark Schoeff Jr. discuss regulations of consequence to financial advisers in 2018, and their likely timing.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Fidelity charging new fee on Vanguard assets held in 401(k) plans

The 0.05% fee is ostensibly a response to Vanguard's distribution model, but may also make the company's funds less attractive due to higher cost.

UBS adviser count continues to decline

Firm to merge U.S., global wealth management units on Feb. 1

TD Ameritrade launches all-night trading for ETFs

Twelve funds now can be traded after-hours, but the list will grow, company says.

Cutting through the red tape of adviser regulation is tricky

Don't expect a simple rollback of rules under the Trump administration in 2018 — instead, regulators are on pace to bolster financial adviser oversight.

Bond investors have more to worry about than a government shutdown

Inflation worries, international rates pushing Treasuries yields higher.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print