SEC to examine mutual fund distribution fees starting next week

After decade of industry evolution, agency hopes to get up to speed

Mar 8, 2013 @ 12:27 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

mutual funds, 12b-1, fees, SEC, securities and exchange commission
+ Zoom

Next week, the Securities and Exchange Commission will launch a nationwide initiative to review mutual fund distribution fees.

Andrew Bowden, deputy director of the SEC's Office of Compliance Examinations and Inspections, today said that the fees have evolved as the financial industry has changed over the last 10 years, and so the agency is trying to get its arms around trends in the area.

“As a commission, what we're trying to do is understand … what are [the payments] for, what are the services being provided, what's the level of oversight of those arrangements by the board?” Mr. Bowden said at the Investment Adviser Association's compliance conference in Arlington, Va. “What is going on in the industry today?”

The SEC has made reviewing fees — including revenue sharing, sub-transfer-agent, 12(b)-1 and conference support — an examination priority this year. Regulators are concerned that the payments could be used to give certain mutual funds preferential treatment and raise costs for investors.

The information will be collected over the next several months and used to evaluate current distribution fee rules.

“The goal is to bring it back and share it with colleagues in policymaking, share it with [SEC] commissioners and try to understand whether or not the current regulatory construct is operating as best as it can to the benefit of investors and markets,” Mr. Bowden said.

He also said that the SEC this year will launch examinations focusing on the use of alternative investments in mutual funds. These reviews will be designed to determine whether the strategies and products comply with regulations that require the funds to have daily valuations and liquidity, and limit the use of leverage.

Mr. Bowden did not reveal how sweep exams would be conducted on distribution fees.

“We have a number of firms we could look at,” Mr. Bowden told reporters on the sidelines of the IAA conference. “We'll just start. To the extent we keep finding the same thing, we'll stop.”

Observers said that the results of the exams could be used to revise a proposal on 12(b)-1 fees that was released in 2010 but has since been dormant.

Amy Lynch, president of FrontLine Compliance LLC, said the SEC is making fund distribution fees a priority in order to generate grist for the regulatory mill.

“That's presumably its primary purpose — to see if there's market abuse to warrant a modification to the rule,” Ms. Lynch said.

One result of the increased emphasis on the distribution schemes is that fund companies will have to provide more details about the payments.

“There's going to be more work to be done in validating these numbers against the contract, against the books and records of the firm,” said Chris John, chief executive of Bonaire Software Solutions LLC.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

INTV

Proposal to delay the DOL fiduciary rule is a turning point

Senior reporter Mark Schoeff Jr. and managing editor Christina Nelson discuss the Labor Department's latest move and what it means for the future of the regulation and the firms preparing for it.

Latest news & opinion

Advisers get more breathing room to make Form ADV changes

RIAs can enter '0' in some new parts of the document before their annual filing next year.

Since banking scandal, Wells Fargo advisers with more than $19.2 billion leave firm

Despite a trying year, the firm has said it will sweeten signing bonuses for veteran advisers.

Is LPL's deal sweet enough for NPH's 3,200 reps and advisers?

They will have to decide if the signing package they are being offered by LPL makes sense. A lot is hanging in the balance.

Eduardo Repetto to leave Dimensional Fund Advisors

Gerald O'Reilly, currently co-CIO, will take over as co-CEO with David Butler.

Alternative strategies boomed after crisis, but haven't been tested

Because the S&P 500 has outperformed, convincing clients they need protection is a hard sell.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print