Gay marriage would shake up benefits game

Advisers await Supreme Court's landmark decision

Mar 31, 2013 @ 12:01 am

By Liz Skinner

same-sex marriage
+ Zoom
Same-sex partners may get same benefits ((Photo: Bloomberg News))

Client tax returns, insurance policies and wills are just a few of the documents that advisers are thinking they might have to throw away and rewrite if the federal law that bans gay marriage is overturned by the Supreme Court.

The scenario is not unlikely after a majority of the court's nine justices last Wednesday sounded dubious about the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, according to those who heard the arguments.

DOMA, which states that a marriage must be between one man and one woman, is the 1996 law that makes it impossible for same-sex couples who were legally married by their state to receive federal marital income and estate tax deductions, as well as other benefits, such as Social Security spousal and survivor benefits, and Veterans Administration survivor benefits and pensions.

"KISS DOMA GOODBYE'

“From everyone I've spoken to, you can kiss DOMA goodbye,” said George Karibjanian, an estate-planning lawyer with Proskauer Rose LLP. “If so, and you are doing a will or trust for a gay couple, they will have all the federal benefits that a spouse would receive at death.”

A state's authority to allow or ban gay marriage is part of a second case about which the high court heard arguments last week. That centers on California's Proposition 8 law — a voter initiative requiring a marriage be between a man and a woman. The justices' questions in that case led most observers to conclude that its decision will be written narrowly to apply, at most, to California alone.

Supporters of gay rights had hoped this case would result in the outlawing of state provisions banning same-sex marriage. Gay marriage is legal in nine states — Connecticut, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Vermont and Washington — and the District of Columbia. Most other states prohibit it in their constitutions or have passed laws against it.

The first thing that financial adviser Deborah Neiman of Neiman and Associates LLC would evaluate for clients if DOMA were overturned is whether gay couples would benefit from amending their 2012 tax returns to file jointly as a married couple. Second, she would examine whether retired same-sex couples should adjust how they collect Social Security benefits to allow for spousal income.

REASSESSING LEGAL DOCUMENTS

Property agreements, wills and insurance policies also would have to be reassessed, she said. Some private pensions that allow for a spouse to be a beneficiary would apply to same-sex couples, eliminating the need for insurance that some couples purchase in order to make up for this support, Ms. Neiman said. If the Supreme Court overturns DOMA, same-sex couples also may qualify for spousal discounts for certain insurance policies.

Financial plans for Ms. Neiman's gay clients were written to take the lack of marital rights into account. Now it may be time to start over.

“We did all the planning with this in mind, knowing that we may have to one day scrap it,” she said. “There will be a combination of new planning that needs to be done and retiring some legal documents” that were created specifically because of rights that weren't guaranteed.

Mr. Karibjanian said same-sex couples who believe DOMA will be overturned and think they could have saved money filing taxes jointly should immediately file protective claims for refunds for tax years going back as far as 2009. That would leave those tax years open so returns could be amended.

Adviser Jill Hollander of Financial Connections Group Inc., however, said she would never bet on how the Supreme Court will rule.

“The questions they asked seemed to follow people's political philosophies,” Ms. Hollander said.

The adviser said some of her clients in same-sex marriages have asked for extensions on their federal taxes until after the Supreme Court rules on the two cases, which is expected to happen by the end of June.

Ms. Hollander said some of her clients are putting off estate planning in case they end up with equal federal rights.

It's unclear whether the court will be swayed by public opinion, which has shifted over the past decade. Today about 49% of the country supports and 44% opposes gay marriage, according to the Pew Research Center. Ten years ago, 33% supported and 58% opposed gay marriage.

“In this case, the country is further ahead of the curve for equality than perhaps the congressional and legal systems are,” Ms. Hollander said.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Apr 30

Conference

Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

AXA's Christine Nigro: How to handle being the only woman in the room

Women face unique challenges as they move into the C-suite, and they need to remember to always be themselves and let their professional strengths shine, according to Christine Nigro, vice chairman at AXA Advisors.

Video Spotlight

Will It Last As Long As Your Clients Do?

Sponsored by Prudential

Video Spotlight

The Catalyst

Sponsored by Pershing

Latest news & opinion

Brian Block's $4 million bonus was tied to a key metric at ARCP

Prosecution rests case in fraud trial against CFO of American Realty Capital Properties.

Edward Jones is winning the Google search war

Brokerage firm's digital marketing investment helps land it at the top of local and overall search engine results, report finds.

Voya's win in 401(k) fee suit involving Financial Engines bodes well for other record keepers

Fidelity, Aon Hewitt and Xerox HR Solutions are currently defending against similar fiduciary-breach claims.

Collective investment trusts getting more attention from 401(k) advisers

The funds are catching on due largely to lower costs and more product availability, but come with some inherent drawbacks.

Vanguard rides robo-advice wave to $65B in assets

Personal Advisor Services, four times the size of its closest competitor, combines digital and human touch.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print