Walter calls lifting Reg D ad ban priority

Apr 21, 2013 @ 12:01 am

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

Securities and Exchange Commission member Elisse Walter told lawmakers last week that a rule that would allow advertising for sales of private-placement investments is a priority for the regulator.

She tried to assure impatient Republican legislators that the SEC will move ahead soon to finish the regulation and others contained in a bill that was approved with overwhelming bipartisan majorities and signed into law more than a year ago.

“I am committed to finalizing these rules and working with my colleagues to do so expeditiously,” Ms. Walter said at a hearing of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.

The chairman of the panel, Rep. Patrick McHenry, R-N.C., and other Republicans expressed frustration that the SEC missed the original deadline for the advertising rule last July and then decided to circulate a proposed rule in August rather than moving straight to an interim final rule.

The provision is one of several in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, which eases securities registration for small companies and was signed into law April 5, 2012.

COMMENT LETTERS

The advertising rule proposal has drawn more than 250 comment letters, many from investor advocates who worry that the proposal lacks adequate investor protections.

Supporters of lifting the advertising ban said that it would help entrepreneurs raise capital.

The nonregistered, or Regulation D, securities could be sold only to accredited investors.

It isn't clear when the SEC will issue a final rule.

New Chairman Mary Jo White has been in office for about two weeks, but during her confirmation hearing last month, she assured Senate Banking Committee members that the SEC would make JOBS Act rule making a priority.

Mr. McHenry pressed Ms. Walter on internal e-mails obtained by the committee that showed that SEC staff members had recommended that the commission circulate an interim final rule last year.

But then-Chairman Mary Schapiro indicated that the worries over potential investor harm justified going through a rule proposal and comment process.

The Consumer Federation of America and the North American Securities Administrators Association Inc., as well as the SEC's Investor Advisory Committee, have urged the commission to modify the proposal to strengthen investor protections.

“It is clear the chairman prioritized special-interest groups over the law,” Mr. McHenry said.

He also questioned whether the SEC can still enforce an advertising ban now that the statutory requirement for a rule has long passed.

The rule has to be finalized before advertising can begin, according to Ms. Walter.

She told legislators that she wants to promulgate the rule but that proposing a rule and reviewing comments helps ensure that investors aren't harmed.

mschoeff@investmentnews.com Twitter: @markschoeff

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

INTV

Diversity & Inclusion Awards: 2018 nominations are open

Editor Fred Gabriel and special projects editor Liz Skinner discuss the nomination process for InvestmentNews' inaugural Diversity & Inclusion awards.

Latest news & opinion

Broker protocol: Indecision over recruiting agreement is rampant

Ruckus over recruiting agreement has even wirehouse lifers wondering if it's time

Cetera reportedly exploring $1.5 billion sale

The company confirmed it's talking to investment bankers to 'explore how to best optimize [its] capital structure at lower costs.'

Advisers bemoan LPL's technology platform change

Those in a private LinkedIn chat room were sounding off about fears the independent broker-dealer will require a move to ClientWorks before it is fully ready.

Speculation mounts on whether others will follow UBS' latest move to prevent brokers from leaving

UBS brokers must sign a 12-month non-solicit agreement if they want their 2017 bonuses.

Maryland jumps into fiduciary fray with legislation requiring brokers to act in best interests of clients

Legislation requires brokers to act in the best interests of clients.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print