Retirement 2.0blog

Social Security rules define when a spouse is a spouse

There's no exception for the gray area of legally separated couples

Apr 22, 2013 @ 9:54 am

By Mary Beth Franklin

I received an interesting question from a reader last week. She asked what are the Social Security claiming rules for a married couple that has been legally separated for years, but is not divorced?

In this case, both spouses are older than the normal retirement age of 66, but the husband—the larger earner—has not yet claimed Social Security benefits. The wife does not have sufficient lifetime earnings to qualify for retirement benefits on her own work record.

The question is does the wife have to wait for her estranged husband to claim benefits before she can collect spousal benefits?

It turns out that the Social Security Administration has a black-and-white definition of marriage. Either you're married or you're not. The rules make no specific provisions for the gray no-man's (or woman's) land of legal separation.

“If your reader is legally married to the worker even though they are estranged, she is his spouse,” Social Security spokesperson Dorothy J. Clark explained. “Therefore, all of the rules regarding spouse's benefits apply to her.”

That means in order for the wife to claim spousal benefits—worth 50% of her husband's benefit amount—he has to file for his benefits. Or, now that he has reached his full retirement age, he could file and suspend his benefits, triggering spousal benefits for her while deferring his own until they are worth the maximum amount at age 70.

Delayed retirement credits are worth 8% per year for each year your postpone collecting benefits between your normal retirement age, currently 66, and age 70.

The sad part of this situation is spousal benefits do not accrue delayed retirement credits. Spousal benefits are worth half of the worker's benefit if claimed at normal retirement age; less if claimed earlier. But they do no grow larger. And this woman is already older than 66, so she has already missed out on collecting some spousal benefits.

I don't know whether their relationship is cordial, but if they are on speaking terms, the decent thing for him to do would be to file and suspend so his wife could collect spousal benefits.

Unfortunately, she does not have the added protection that divorced spouses have that allow them to claim retirement benefits based on their ex-spouse's earnings record without his or her knowledge, even if the ex has not yet claimed benefits.

To claim Social Security benefits on your ex, your marriage must have lasted for at least 10 years and you must be unmarried. And as long as both spouses are at least 62 years old, and they have been divorced for at least two years, one can claim spousal benefits on the other's earnings record, even if he or she has not yet retired.

But remember that anytime a spouse or worker claims benefits before their full retirement age while they continue to work, their benefits may be reduced if their earnings exceed this year's limit of $15,120.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Events

The power of data

Your clients have financial news and data at their fingertips, but donít know how to interpret it. Katy Gibson of Envestnet|Yodlee and Blake Kannady of Envestnet discuss the power of leveraging aggregated data.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Tax law: Everything advisers need to know about the pass-through provision

The provision is tricky, but could provide advisers and business-owner clients with sizable tax savings.

Bill requiring fiduciary disclosure reintroduced in New Jersey

Measures would obligate financial advisers to tell clients they do not have to act in their best interests.

Merrill Lynch to let advisers text with clients

Texting has been a popular mode of communication for years, but in the past the firm's regulations have prevented advisers from using it.

Bear market for bonds has arrived, Gross says

10-year Treasury rate's move above 2.5% confirms outlook for fixed income, legendary bond manager says.

Court decision on DOL fiduciary rule expected in February

Opponents and advocates of the regulation have been waiting for months for the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans to issue its opinion.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print