Fewer advisers than expected switch to state oversight

Mergers, closings and growth lead to about 2,100 advisers moving vs. 4,000 forecast

May 17, 2013 @ 1:57 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

Fewer SEC-registered investment advisers made the transition to state oversight than anticipated when the Dodd-Frank financial reform law was enacted three years ago, according to a report by state securities regulators.

When the North American Securities Administrators Association Inc. first testified before Congress about the so-called “switch” in 2009, while the Dodd-Frank legislation was being crafted, the organization estimated that about 4,000 advisers would move to the states from the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Now that the switch is complete, the number has turned out to be about 2,100, the NASAA report states.

The smaller wave did not surprise the organization. Over the nearly three years it took for the switch to be completed — from Dodd-Frank enactment in July 2010 to last February — some firms went out of business and others merged, while others grew to reach an asset level that qualified them to maintain SEC registration.

“It was always a moving target,” NASAA spokesman Bob Webster said.

Under Dodd-Frank, advisers with assets under management between $25 million and $100 million were moved to state oversight from SEC jurisdiction. The goal was to ease the SEC's responsibility for RIAs and make room for the private fund advisers that the SEC had to take on due to Dodd-Frank.

At the beginning of the year, the SEC had 10,754 registered investment advisers under its jurisdiction, with assets under management totaling $49.6 trillion, according to the agency's budget request to Congress. Since Dodd-Frank went into effect, the agency has added about 1,400 previously unregistered private-equity and hedge fund advisers.

The report provides a history of the switch, a term that was developed during a NASAA strategy meeting in Baltimore in July 2010.

The state regulators promoted the move as a way to strengthen oversight of advisers, arguing that they are in the best position to keep tabs on the smaller firms.

It also gave them a chance to extend their reach, which had diminished since the passage of the National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996, according to the report.

“We lost a lot of regulatory authority in NSMIA, and I wanted to make sure that in Dodd-Frank, the states did not lose any more,” former Texas securities commissioner and former NASAA president Denise Voigt Crawford said in the report. “The best defense was a good offense. We were going to try to achieve greater jurisdiction in Dodd-Frank.”

The switch process deepened the relationship between state and SEC regulators.

“The IA switch is the most collaborative we've been with the SEC, post-NSMIA,” Melanie Senter Lubin, Maryland securities commissioner and chairwoman of the NASAA Switch Task Force, said in the report.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

INTV

Cameras roll at Best Places to Work for Financial Advisers' awards

Advisory firm winners on the top 50 InvestmentNews list of Best Places to Work for Financial Advisers explain the significance of this recognition at the Chicago awards event.

Latest news & opinion

RIA in a Box acquired by private equity firm Aquiline Capital

New owners plan more growth for the software service provider.

IBDs with the most female reps

Here are the 10 independent-broker dealers that have the most female reps.

Supreme Court decision likely to prevent brokers from filing class-action lawsuits

However, it likely won't bar employees from filing 401(k) lawsuits against their employers.

5th Circuit denies states' second attempt to defend DOL fiduciary rule

The three-judge panel split again, 2-1, in deciding not to take another look at the motion to intervene by California, New York and Oregon.

Finra anticipates oversight role for SEC advice rule

CEO Robert Cook says one area for examination could be the proposed requirement that brokers act in the best interests of their clients.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print