SIFMA tells SEC that fiduciary standard would cost a bundle

Jul 7, 2013 @ 12:01 am

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

A leading Wall Street trade organization told the Securities and Exchange Commission last week that raising investment advice standards for brokers would force individual firms to spend millions of dollars to upgrade their compliance systems.

The companies are willing to absorb the increased costs as long as new rules are written to accommodate the brokerage business model, according to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association.

In a letter SIFMA sent to the SEC last Friday, the organization said that nine of its member firms estimated that it would cost each of them $5 million annually to upgrade their compliance, supervision and training systems.

Another seven firms estimated that if brokers were to adopt disclosure forms similar to those that investment advisers use at the beginning of a client relationship, it would cost about $3 million per firm annually.

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS

The SIFMA letter was in response to an SEC request for information for a cost-benefit analysis the agency is conducting of a potential uniform fiduciary standard for retail investment advice. The deadline for comment letters was last Friday. The agency will use the regulatory impact study to determine whether to proceed with a rule.

The Dodd-Frank financial reform law gave the SEC the authority to require that anyone providing advice act in their clients' best interests, the fiduciary standard that investment advisers already meet. Brokers currently adhere to a less stringent suitability standard that requires that investment products they sell fit an investor's financial needs and risk profile.

“We remain broadly supportive of pursuing a uniform fiduciary standard,” Kevin Carroll, SIFMA's associate general counsel, said in an interview last week previewing the SIFMA letter. “The cost estimates don't change that view.”

He added that if the SEC promulgates a fiduciary-duty rule, “the standard needs to be established in an appropriate manner that recognizes the differences in the broker-dealer business model.”

The Investment Advisers Act of 1940 — which provides the fiduciary standard under which investment advisers currently work — can't be extended to brokers, according to Mr. Carroll.

For instance, an adviser's relationship with a client is continuous, but a broker's is episodic. In addition, the law requires advisers to eliminate or avoid conflicts of interest, while brokers must acknowledge them.

MANAGING CONFLICTS

“We're looking for rules that recognize and provide guidance about how conflicts could be managed and disclosed consistent with [acting in] the best interest of retail clients,” Mr. Carroll said.

In its comment letter, the National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors said a uniform-fiduciary-duty rule would harm middle-income investors.

The group released a survey showing that 84% of financial advisers said that their business costs would increase if the SEC lifted the advice bar.

The poll indicated that 43.9% of the respondents would pass on the higher costs to their clients by imposing or increasing fees, while another 48% said they would limit their practice to clients with a minimum amount of assets.

NAIFA and The American College of Financial Services conducted the online poll of 2,419 NAIFA members, school alumni and other financial professionals May 20-29. About two-thirds of NAIFA's approximately 41,000 members are registered representatives of broker-dealers and mostly sell variable annuities, variable life insurance and mutual funds.

NAIFA emphasized that 83% of the advisers surveyed said that the majority of their clients have investment portfolios of less than $250,000, and more than half serve clients with less than $100,000 in their accounts.

NAIFA argued that raising the broker advice standard to the fiduciary-duty level would increase compliance costs and force them to abandon investors with modest assets.

INVESTORS FIRST

The Consumer Federation of America warned the SEC not to water down the fiduciary duty.

“We are frankly concerned that unless the commission is prepared to abandon its past propensity to protect the broker-dealer business model at the expense of protecting investors, it will be incapable of developing a fiduciary standard for brokers that truly puts the interests of investors first,” Barbara Roper, the CFA's director of investor protection, wrote in its comment letter.

In a June 27 letter to the SEC, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin asserted that average investors are hurt by brokers who do not have to act in their best interests but rather can sell high-commission, risky alternative investment products as long as they meet the suitability parameters.

He cited a 2010 Massachusetts case in which investors lost $5.7 million on fraudulent private-placement notes. He encouraged the SEC to find similar data about losses investors incurred due to bad advice from brokers.

“I urge the commission not to capitulate to industry advocates and the courts that would relegate investor protection to a "bean counter' analysis concerned with the quantification of industry costs to the exclusion of the harmed warm-blooded investor,” wrote Mr. Galvin, Massachusetts' chief securities regulator.

“While you cannot put a price on investor protection, you can gauge the price paid by investors from the losses they suffer under the current system,” he added.

mschoeff@investmentnews.com Twitter: @markschoeff

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Apr 30

Conference

Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

Advisers beware: tax law has unintended consequences

Commission accounts could be preferable for some clients, and advisers could be incentivized to move from employee broker-dealers to independent channels.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Bond investors have more to worry about than a government shutdown

Inflation worries, international rates pushing Treasuries yields higher.

State measures to prevent elder financial abuse gaining steam

A growing number of states are looking to pass rules preventing exploitation of seniors.

Morgan Stanley reports a loss of advisers after exiting the protocol for broker recruiting

The firm said it lost 47 brokers in the fourth quarter, the most in any quarter of 2017.

Morgan Stanley's wealth management fees climb to all-time high

Improvement reflect firm's shift of more clients into fee-based accounts priced on asset levels, which boosts results as markets rise.

Legislation would make it harder for investors to sue mutual funds over high fees

A plaintiff would have to state in their initial complaint why fiduciary duty was breached, and then prove the violation with 'clear and convincing evidence.'

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print