Finra postpones action on recruitment disclosure rule

Proposal would require brokerages to inform customers about incentive deals with reps

Jul 8, 2013 @ 4:09 pm

By Dan Jamieson

Finra
+ Zoom

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. has postponed action on a controversial proposal to require disclosure to customers of broker recruitment deals.

As reported earlier, a notice on Finra's site said the Finra board would “consider an updated [disclosure] proposal” at its board meeting July 11.

But Finra spokesperson Nancy Condon said the organization's board had pushed off consideration of the rule to a later date, due to tight scheduling. She had no further information.

The SRO's board must give its approval before Finra staff can file rules with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In January, the industry regulator asked for comment about its initial disclosure proposal. The plan would require a brokerage firm to disclose to customers the upfront or back-end bonuses, accelerated payouts and other forms of transition assistance given to a new recruit. The disclosure rule would apply to customers who are solicited for a period of one year following that broker's transfer to the new firm. The rule, as initially proposed, would not apply to incentives totaling less than $50,000.

Several hybrid advisers said they wanted Finra to act on the rule.

“I think it's very much needed and long overdue,” said Jonathan Heller, founder of JG Heller Private Wealth Advisors Inc.

“Reps get an enormous amount of money, and the [recruiting] firms counsel the adviser to just focus on the positives of the new firm,” Mr. Heller said. “But in reality, if there's a multimillion-dollar check involved, clients have no knowledge of that.”

“I'm in full favor of it,” Gerard Gloisten, president of GBS Financial Corp., said about Finra's proposal. “The reality is, there are a certain number of reps who hop from firm to firm for the bonus. It's not fair for anyone involved.”

Finra's initial plan generated over 60 comment letters. In comments, industry trade groups said they supported disclosure, but wanted the proposal narrowed or changed.

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association urged Finra to adopt a plain-English disclosure model focusing on potential conflicts for firms to use.

The National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors wanted Finra to increase the compensation threshold for disclosure to $100,000, and decrease the time frame to less than one year.

The Financial Services Institute Inc. said disclosure should also apply to retention bonuses as well as to recruiting deals.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Events

How to effectively engage and serve female clients

It is clear building relationships with women is a proven way to grow your business. Heather Ettinger of Fairport Asset Management explains proven segmentation strategies.

Latest news & opinion

Jay Clayton says SEC, DOL can give market 'clarity' on fiduciary rule

Chief regulator is confident two agencies could reach 'common ground' on an investment advice standard across all accounts.

Vanguard winning at bond inflows, too

But iShares is strong competition.

DOL fiduciary rule causing DC-plan record keepers to change business with insurance agents

Principal has communicated that independent agents must change their business models to keep receiving compensation.

DOL fiduciary rule opponents want to push implementation back until 2019

ICI, Chamber of Commerce among groups asking for delay, while Democratic lawmakers call on DOL to keep to its earlier planned schedule of Jan. 1, 2018.

Take 5: Vanguard's new CIO Greg Davis talks bonds, stocks and costs

Having just stepped into the role, this veteran of the firm now oversees $3.8 trillion in assets in more than 300 mutual funds and exchange-traded funds.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print