Chance of sizable SEC budget boost gets dimmer

House budget proposal doesn't come close to meeting figure requested by Mary Jo White

Jul 9, 2013 @ 6:10 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

House lawmakers are poised to deny the Securities and Exchange Commission the budget increase the agency says is required to strengthen oversight of investment advisers.

The House Appropriations Committee released on Tuesday its financial services budget proposal, which authorizes $1.371 billion in SEC spending. That's $303 million less than the $1.674 billion SEC budget request but $50 million more than the SEC's current $1.321 billion budget.

In congressional testimony during her first three months in office, SEC Chairman Mary Jo White asserted that a substantial budget boost would allow the agency to put more muscle into adviser regulation. She said the agency currently examines annually about 8% of the nearly 10,000 registered advisers -- and 40% of them have never been examined.

“Therefore, under the [fiscal year] 2014 request, one of the SEC's top priorities is to hire 250 additional examiners to increase the proportion of advisers examined each year, the rate of first-time examinations, and the examination coverage of investment advisers and newly registered private fund advisers,” Ms. White told the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government at a May 7 hearing.

So far, it looks as if Ms. White's request has fallen on deaf ears. The House Appropriations subcommittee is scheduled to vote on the SEC's budget – and those of other agencies under its jurisdiction – on Wednesday. Passage by the panel and the full appropriations committee is certain. The bill would then move to the House floor for likely approval by the chamber, which is controlled by Republicans.

The Senate Appropriations Committee, led by Democrats, is consistently more generous with the SEC budget.

Over the last couple years, the House and Senate could not agree on a final federal budget and instead passed so-called continuing resolutions that kept agency funding flat – a scenario that could be repeated at the end of the federal fiscal year in late September.

The House financial services appropriations bill totals $17 billion, or $4.3 billion below fiscal year 2013 levels and $3 billion less than current funding after sequestration cuts.

The House's SEC allocation, although $50 million above current funding levels, effectively denies the agency more spending authority because it also prevents the SEC from utilizing money from its so-called reserve fund. The Dodd-Frank financial reform law allowed the agency to spend up to $50 million annually from that pot of money.

The House budget bill also compels the SEC to spend at least $50 million on technology upgrades and to allocate at least $44.4 million to the Division of Economic and Risk Analysis.

The SEC's total spending has no impact on the federal budget deficit because it is offset by fees the agency collects on securities transactions.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

RIA Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' RIA Data Center to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

Featured video


How 401(k) advisers can use 'centers of influence' to grow their business

Leveraging relationships with accounting, benefits, and property and casualty insurance firms can help deliver new business leads for retirement plan advisers.

Latest news & opinion

Things are looking up: IBDs soared in 2017

With revenue up, interest rates rising and regulation easing, IBDs are soaring.

SEC advice rule may give RIAs leg up over broker-dealers

Experts say advisers will be able to point to their role as fiduciaries as a differentiator in the advice market.

Brokers accept proposed SEC rule on who can call themselves an adviser

Some say the rule will clear up investor confusion, but others say the SEC didn't go far enough.

Cadaret Grant acquired by private-equity-backed Atria

75-year-old owner Arthur Grant positions the IBD for the 'next 33 years.'

SEC advice rule seeks to tighten reins on brokers

The proposed rule puts new restrictions on brokers, but it is still unclear how strongly the SEC is clamping down.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print