Gandolfini heirs will likely end up in court over giant tax bill: Lawyer

Staring at potential $30M payout to IRS and state authorities; 'will not be pleased with their tax advisers'

Jul 12, 2013 @ 1:57 pm

By Liz Skinner

The enormous estate tax bill that heirs of the late actor James Gandolfini may be facing could trigger legal action, says one attorney.

Provisions in Mr. Gandolfini's last will and testament suggest that the actor's estate -- valued at some $70 million -- may have to fork over $30 million in federal and New York taxes, according to William Zabel, founding partner of Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP.

Mr. Gandolfini, best known for his role as mobster Tony Soprano, signed his will in December, six months before he died of a heart attack while vacationing in Italy. He was 51.

The actor's will left 30% to each of two sisters and 20% to his daughter Liliana, who was born in October. His wife, Deborah Lin, is to receive the other 20% of his estate, as well as all his personal property other than his clothing and jewelry, which Mr. Gandolfini left to his 13-year-old son.

As his spouse, Ms. Lin's 20% wouldn't immediately create an estate tax liability because federal rules usually allow such inheritances without spurring a tax until her death. But the sisters and daughter who will inherit 80% of Mr. Gandolfini's estate will have to pay 40% to Uncle Sam beyond the first $5.25 million federal exemption.

“His heirs will not be pleased with their tax advisers,” said estate attorney Gary Wolfe, who expects that the case will end up in litigation. “You can't stick a client with a $30 million tax problem and ride off into the sunset.”

If the estate has to liquidate assets in order to pay the taxes, those assets will have to be sold at whatever the market bears, “so then they get killed twice,” Mr. Wolfe said.

At a minimum, an irrevocable trust should have been set up for Mr. Gandolfini to use to pay insurance premiums toward a life insurance policy that would have covered expected estate taxes, Mr. Wolfe said.

“Nobody likes losing money, especially when you don't have to,” Mr. Wolfe said.

Mr. Wolfe, who doesn't have knowledge of Mr. Gandolfini's affairs, said that the actor may have been advised to do further estate planning, but he refused.

Mr. Gandolfini also may not have been able to get insurance, Mr. Wolfe said. The actor had admitted to having cocaine and alcohol issues in the past, and he was overweight.

It is possible that Mr. Gandolfini was told about the tax bill but was willing to pay the tax as long as his goals were met in the will, according to Frank Fantozzi, chief executive of Planned Financial Services.

The will mentions that Mr. Gandolfini has a separate trust set up for his son.

Or, given that Mr. Gandolfini died younger than he likely expected, he may not have completed estate-planning techniques that would have removed some of these assets from his estate and supported his heirs in other ways, Mr. Fantozzi said.

Such plans may have included setting up family limited partnerships on properties that Mr. Gandolfini owned or creating a credit shelter trust to make sure that the actor and his wife made full use of their estate tax exemptions, Mr. Fantozzi said.

The eye-popping tax liabilities likely in this high-profile case serve as a reminder that putting off estate planning can hurt those left behind.

“Whether you have $70 million or a more modest estate, good planning is important,” said Danielle Mayoras, principal partner at Barron Rosenberg Mayoras & Mayoras PC. “When you have minor children, it's even more important.”

Mr. Gandolfini's will calls for his daughter to receive her wealth at 21, an age that many think is too young to handle such a large fortune.

It could have been spread out so that it became hers over time, said Ms. Mayoras, who co-wrote “Trial & Heirs: Famous Fortune Fights” (Wise Circle Books, 2009).

“When you have an estate that size, most people don't want their children getting all the money when they are in their 20s,” Ms. Mayoras said.

As to how anyone could have allowed so little planning to be done for such a large fortune, she said that clients don't always want to follow the advice their attorneys give them.

“Sometimes clients are their own worst enemies,” Ms. Mayoras said.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

Apr 30

Conference

Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video

Events

The power of automation

With good data and great workflow processes, advisers can outpace the competition. Junxure's Robert DeFrancis offers some strategies for success.

Latest news & opinion

Senate committee approves tax plan but full passage not assured

Several Republican senators expressed reservations about the bill, and the GOP cannot afford too many defections.

House passes tax bill, focus turns to Senate

Tax reform legislation expected to have more of a challenge in upper chamber.

SEC enforcement of advisers drops in Trump era

The agency pursued 82 cases against advisers and firms in fiscal year 2017, down from 98 the previous year.

PIABA accuses Finra of conflicts of interest

Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association report slams self-regulator over its picks for board of governors.

Betterment launches 'free' charitable-giving platform

Robo-software provider lets investors donate directly from their accounts, and will not charge charities with less than $1 million on the platform.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print