Gandolfini heirs will likely end up in court over giant tax bill: Lawyer

Staring at potential $30M payout to IRS and state authorities; 'will not be pleased with their tax advisers'

Jul 12, 2013 @ 1:57 pm

By Liz Skinner

James Ganolfini
+ Zoom
Gandolfini: Estate of confusion ((Photo: Bloomberg News))

The enormous estate tax bill that heirs of the late actor James Gandolfini may be facing could trigger legal action, says one attorney.

Provisions in Mr. Gandolfini's last will and testament suggest that the actor's estate -- valued at some $70 million -- may have to fork over $30 million in federal and New York taxes, according to William Zabel, founding partner of Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP.

Mr. Gandolfini, best known for his role as mobster Tony Soprano, signed his will in December, six months before he died of a heart attack while vacationing in Italy. He was 51.

The actor's will left 30% to each of two sisters and 20% to his daughter Liliana, who was born in October. His wife, Deborah Lin, is to receive the other 20% of his estate, as well as all his personal property other than his clothing and jewelry, which Mr. Gandolfini left to his 13-year-old son.

As his spouse, Ms. Lin's 20% wouldn't immediately create an estate tax liability because federal rules usually allow such inheritances without spurring a tax until her death. But the sisters and daughter who will inherit 80% of Mr. Gandolfini's estate will have to pay 40% to Uncle Sam beyond the first $5.25 million federal exemption.

“His heirs will not be pleased with their tax advisers,” said estate attorney Gary Wolfe, who expects that the case will end up in litigation. “You can't stick a client with a $30 million tax problem and ride off into the sunset.”

If the estate has to liquidate assets in order to pay the taxes, those assets will have to be sold at whatever the market bears, “so then they get killed twice,” Mr. Wolfe said.

At a minimum, an irrevocable trust should have been set up for Mr. Gandolfini to use to pay insurance premiums toward a life insurance policy that would have covered expected estate taxes, Mr. Wolfe said.

“Nobody likes losing money, especially when you don't have to,” Mr. Wolfe said.

Mr. Wolfe, who doesn't have knowledge of Mr. Gandolfini's affairs, said that the actor may have been advised to do further estate planning, but he refused.

Mr. Gandolfini also may not have been able to get insurance, Mr. Wolfe said. The actor had admitted to having cocaine and alcohol issues in the past, and he was overweight.

It is possible that Mr. Gandolfini was told about the tax bill but was willing to pay the tax as long as his goals were met in the will, according to Frank Fantozzi, chief executive of Planned Financial Services.

The will mentions that Mr. Gandolfini has a separate trust set up for his son.

Or, given that Mr. Gandolfini died younger than he likely expected, he may not have completed estate-planning techniques that would have removed some of these assets from his estate and supported his heirs in other ways, Mr. Fantozzi said.

Such plans may have included setting up family limited partnerships on properties that Mr. Gandolfini owned or creating a credit shelter trust to make sure that the actor and his wife made full use of their estate tax exemptions, Mr. Fantozzi said.

The eye-popping tax liabilities likely in this high-profile case serve as a reminder that putting off estate planning can hurt those left behind.

“Whether you have $70 million or a more modest estate, good planning is important,” said Danielle Mayoras, principal partner at Barron Rosenberg Mayoras & Mayoras PC. “When you have minor children, it's even more important.”

Mr. Gandolfini's will calls for his daughter to receive her wealth at 21, an age that many think is too young to handle such a large fortune.

It could have been spread out so that it became hers over time, said Ms. Mayoras, who co-wrote “Trial & Heirs: Famous Fortune Fights” (Wise Circle Books, 2009).

“When you have an estate that size, most people don't want their children getting all the money when they are in their 20s,” Ms. Mayoras said.

As to how anyone could have allowed so little planning to be done for such a large fortune, she said that clients don't always want to follow the advice their attorneys give them.

“Sometimes clients are their own worst enemies,” Ms. Mayoras said.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Apr 30


Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video


Tech tools of tomorrow: Innovations your firms can't live without in 2020

Gadget Girl hits the tech pavilion at Pershing INSITE to see what exciting new tools advisers can't afford to miss.

Video Spotlight

Will It Last As Long As Your Clients Do?

Sponsored by Prudential

Video Spotlight

The Catalyst

Sponsored by Pershing

Latest news & opinion

Brian Block denies cooking the books at Schorsch REIT

Former CFO claims everything he did was 'appropriate' and 'correct.'

Interns will take on several roles at advisory firms this summer

College students are helping with client prep, firm visioning and long-term projects, among other duties.

10 funds with largest 3-year outflows

Even well-managed funds that have beaten the S&P 500’s 10.1% average annual gain have watched investors flee.

Wirehouse training programs are back

At one time, major brokerage houses ran large, expensive training programs for thousands of young brokers, and now it looks as if they are about to return to that model.

New military pension rules need financial advisers to step up and serve

Matching defined contribution plan expected to see more money, more need for sound advice.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print